H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Hana Mandlikova vs Helen Kelesi H2H: 2-1

Hana Mandlikova holds a 2–1 lead over Helen Kelesi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Helen Kelesi leads 1–0 on carpet, while Hana Mandlikova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1987 Key Biscayne first round 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hana Mandlikova
AUS Age 64 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Helen Kelesi
CAN Age 56 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 24, 1987* Key Biscayne WTA 250 R128 Hard Hana Mandlikova #4 6-1 7-5 Helen Kelesi #49 Match data
Jan 3, 1987* Brisbane WTA 500 QF Grass Hana Mandlikova #4 6-3 6-3 Helen Kelesi #39 Match data
Jan 17, 1986* Worcester WTA 250 R16 Carpet Helen Kelesi #46 6-3 6-1 Hana Mandlikova #3 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Hana Mandlikova #31 #3 157 2,299 516 191 73.0% 4 0 0 3 18 25
Helen Kelesi #755 #13 54 1,958 213 164 56.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hana Mandlikova Helen Kelesi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1985 15–15 50.0% #48 1,642 0 0
16 1978 22–8 73.3% — 1,750 0 1 1986 28–21 57.1% #39 1,745 0 1
17 1979 36–14 72.0% — 1,985 0 5 1987 22–19 53.7% #32 1,785 0 1
18 1980 76–17 81.7% — 2,230 1 11 1988 33–18 64.7% #19 1,848 0 2
19 1981 56–24 70.0% — 2,108 2 14 1989 36–18 66.7% #13 1,873 0 2
20 1982 35–19 64.8% — 1,998 2 14 1990 23–17 57.5% #25 1,785 0 2
21 1983 44–21 67.7% — 1,977 2 14 1991 26–20 56.5% #29 1,716 0 2
22 1984 47–11 81.0% #3 2,081 2 19 1992 7–13 35.0% #128 1,633 0 2
23 1985 53–13 80.3% #3 2,210 3 22 1993 18–13 58.1% #48 1,756 0 2
24 1986 44–15 74.6% #4 2,233 3 22 1994 5–10 33.3% #125 1,646 0 2
25 1987 47–13 78.3% #5 2,136 4 25 — — — — — — —
26 1988 15–7 68.2% #29 2,031 4 25 — — — — — — —
27 1989 33–19 63.5% #14 1,941 4 25 — — — — — — —
28 1990 8–9 47.1% #31 1,809 4 25 — — — — — — —