H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Hana Mandlikova vs Kate Latham H2H: 2-0

Hana Mandlikova holds a 2–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1982 Mahwah round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hana Mandlikova
AUS Age 64 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 74

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hana Mandlikova 6-3 6-4 Kate Latham Match data Aug 26, 1982* R32 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard
Hana Mandlikova 6-3 6-4 Kate Latham Match data Feb 21, 1981* QF Houston WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hana Mandlikova — #3 157 2,316 518 193 72.9% 4 0 0 6 17 27
Kate Latham — — — 1,865 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hana Mandlikova Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,758 0 2 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1979 37–14 72.5% — 1,991 0 7 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1980 76–17 81.7% #4 2,237 1 13 — — — — — — —
19 1981 56–25 69.1% #5 2,128 2 16 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1982 35–19 64.8% #7 2,027 2 16 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1983 44–21 67.7% — 1,983 2 16 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1984 47–11 81.0% #3 2,085 2 21 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1985 53–14 79.1% #3 2,211 3 24 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 1986 44–15 74.6% #4 2,242 3 24 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,749 0 3
25 1987 47–13 78.3% #5 2,157 4 27 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,662 0 3
26 1988 15–7 68.2% #29 2,045 4 27 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,853 0 3
27 1989 33–19 63.5% #14 1,946 4 27 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,750 0 4
28 1990 8–9 47.1% — 1,810 4 27 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,775 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,685 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,624 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,493 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,527 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hana Mandlikova Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1979 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 23 4 27 85.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 19 5 24 79.2% 18 3 21 85.7% 20 5 25 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1981 11 4 15 73.3% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 22 13 35 62.9% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1982 11 5 16 68.8% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1983 12 4 16 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 27 2 29 93.1% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1985 22 5 27 81.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 14 2 16 87.5% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1986 7 2 9 77.8% 11 3 14 78.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1987 14 5 19 73.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 1 13 92.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1988 11 4 15 73.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1989 19 9 28 67.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 143 55 198 72.2% 119 47 166 71.7% 116 36 152 76.3% 133 52 185 71.9% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hana Mandlikova Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1977 1492 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1978 1759 142.2 — — — — — -127 -39 71.4% +1.84 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 104.0 +1.40 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 1979 1991 150.8 — — — — -305 -197 +5 67.6% +1.46 8–3 (73%) 5–6 (45%) 107.5 -0.89 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1980 2238 169.1 — — — — -86 -220 -74 77.5% +2.09 15–12 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 107.9 -9.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1981 2129 169.7 — — — — -47 -13 +79 69.9% +1.55 7–4 (64%) 5–6 (45%) 100.5 -7.13 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.61
20 1982 2027 155.4 — — — — +43 +110 +36 60.3% +0.61 12–5 (71%) 6–5 (55%) 101.1 -5.96 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1983 1984 163.7 — — — — +67 +169 +26 70.3% +1.45 3–9 (25%) 7–1 (88%) 95.7 -3.62 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.17
22 1984 2085 166.1 — — — — +42 +34 -16 76.7% +2.05 10–5 (67%) 8–4 (67%) 103.0 -2.48 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.71
23 1985 2211 170.8 — — — — +71 -92 -92 75.0% +1.78 9–5 (64%) 12–3 (80%) 109.1 -5.37 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.34
24 1986 2242 175.0 — — — — +27 -50 -79 70.7% +1.50 10–5 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 98.7 -6.69 1977 1750 140.9 — — — — -8 -120 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -1.23
25 1987 2157 169.0 — — — — +17 +18 +141 75.8% +1.97 9–3 (75%) 7–4 (64%) 102.5 -3.70 1978 1663 118.4 — — — — +3 -12 +67 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +1.97
26 1988 2046 145.0 — — — — +89 +59 +204 65.3% +1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 93.6 -0.30 1979 1853 149.7 — — — — -20 -164 -98 46.0% -0.27 8–6 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 -2.28
27 1989 1946 155.2 — — — — +75 +101 +225 57.5% +0.38 15–3 (83%) 9–3 (75%) 105.4 -3.66 1980 1750 133.2 — — — — -27 — +15 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.93
28 1990 1811 125.0 — — — — +120 +175 +361 51.4% +0.19 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.31 1981 1776 142.9 — — — — -18 — +4 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.97
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1686 128.3 — — — — +50 -103 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.20
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1624 115.1 — — — — +52 -49 +72 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.86
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1493 91.7 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.46
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
Career — 2317 169.5 — — — — +11 -15 +16 70.1% +1.51 107–63 (63%) 76–52 (59%) 107.1 -6.75 — 1866 138.2 — — — — -3 -78 -9 49.2% -0.03 56–61 (48%) 41–38 (52%) 101.2 +0.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.