H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Hana Mandlikova vs Kim Jones H2H: 1-0

Hana Mandlikova holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hana Mandlikova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1985 Oakland round of 16 6-0 6-1.

AUS Age 64 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 68

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hana Mandlikova #7 6-0 6-1 Kim Jones Match data Feb 22, 1985* R16 Oakland WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hana Mandlikova #31 #3 157 2,315 518 191 73.1% 4 0 0 4 19 27
Kim Jones 1,800 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hana Mandlikova Kim Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1977 0–1 0.0% 1,491 0 0
16 1978 23–8 74.2% 1,758 0 2
17 1979 37–14 72.5% 1,990 0 7
18 1980 76–17 81.7% #4 2,235 1 13
19 1981 56–24 70.0% #5 2,127 2 16
20 1982 35–19 64.8% #7 2,025 2 16 1978 1–1 50.0% 1,506 0 0
21 1983 44–21 67.7% 1,982 2 16 1979 0–1 0.0% 1,489 0 0
22 1984 47–11 81.0% #3 2,084 2 21 1980 1–10 9.1% 1,422 0 0
23 1985 53–13 80.3% #3 2,213 3 24 1981 6–13 31.6% 1,458 0 0
24 1986 44–15 74.6% #4 2,242 3 24 1982 4–14 22.2% 1,483 0 0
25 1987 47–13 78.3% #5 2,156 4 27 1983 20–14 58.8% 1,757 0 1
26 1988 15–7 68.2% #29 2,045 4 27 1984 13–24 35.1% 1,667 0 1
27 1989 33–19 63.5% #14 1,945 4 27 1985 13–18 41.9% 1,724 0 1
28 1990 8–9 47.1% #31 1,810 4 27 1986 2–4 33.3% 1,677 0 1
29 1987 0–4 0.0% 1,629 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hana Mandlikova Kim Jones
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1977 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 8 3 11 72.7%
17 1979 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 23 4 27 85.2% 2 4 6 33.3%
18 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 19 5 24 79.2% 18 3 21 85.7% 20 5 25 80.0%
19 1981 11 3 14 78.6% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 22 13 35 62.9%
20 1982 11 5 16 68.8% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0%
21 1983 12 4 16 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 6 13 53.8%
22 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 27 2 29 93.1% 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1985 22 5 27 81.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 14 2 16 87.5% 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1986 7 2 9 77.8% 11 3 14 78.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
25 1987 14 5 19 73.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 1 13 92.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 1988 11 4 15 73.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7%
27 1989 19 9 28 67.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
28 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
Career 143 54 197 72.6% 119 46 165 72.1% 116 36 152 76.3% 133 52 185 71.9% 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hana Mandlikova Kim Jones
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1977 1492 100.1 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.02
16 1978 1759 142.2 -128 -39 71.4% +1.84 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 104.0 +1.62
17 1979 1991 150.7 -306 -198 +6 67.9% +1.46 9–3 (75%) 5–6 (45%) 108.6 -0.72
18 1980 2235 168.8 -89 -219 -70 77.5% +2.09 15–12 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 107.8 -9.15
19 1981 2127 168.7 -45 -13 +80 70.8% +1.60 7–4 (64%) 5–6 (45%) 100.4 -6.49
20 1982 2025 155.2 +44 +111 +37 60.3% +0.61 12–5 (71%) 6–5 (55%) 101.1 -6.83 1978 1506 102.4 50.0% -0.75 -0.08
21 1983 1983 163.6 +67 +169 +26 70.3% +1.45 3–9 (25%) 7–1 (88%) 95.7 -3.35 1979 1490 +0.09
22 1984 2084 165.9 +42 +34 -16 76.7% +2.05 10–5 (67%) 8–4 (67%) 103.0 -1.62 1980 1423 94.6 +36 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.50
23 1985 2213 169.9 +68 -92 -93 76.0% +1.84 9–5 (64%) 12–3 (80%) 109.1 -4.75 1981 1459 107.5 +44 +75 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 +1.50
24 1986 2242 174.9 +26 -48 -79 70.7% +1.50 10–5 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 98.7 -6.78 1982 1484 103.7 -68 -7 +110 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.59
25 1987 2156 168.9 +16 +20 +142 75.8% +1.97 9–3 (75%) 7–4 (64%) 102.5 -3.19 1983 1758 131.9 -40 -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.43
26 1988 2045 145.0 +89 +61 +204 65.3% +1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 93.6 -0.30 1984 1667 132.6 +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.22
27 1989 1946 155.1 +75 +103 +225 57.5% +0.38 15–3 (83%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 -3.52 1985 1725 135.5 -10 -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.52
28 1990 1810 125.0 +120 +176 +361 51.4% +0.19 2–3 (40%) 1–1 +0.31 1986 1677 104.5 -12 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.70
29 1987 1629 103.9 -23 11.1% -2.67 0–1 -0.24
Career 2316 169.2 +11 -14 +17 70.3% +1.52 108–63 (63%) 76–52 (59%) 107.2 -6.38 1801 126.3 -7 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.