H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Hana Mandlikova vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 2-2
Hana Mandlikova and Larisa Savchenko are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1990 Berlin third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1990* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Larisa Savchenko | 6-3 6-0 | Hana Mandlikova | Match data |
| Apr 1, 1990* | San Antonio | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Hana Mandlikova | 6-4 7-5 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Feb 20, 1988* | Oakland | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Larisa Savchenko | 6-3 2-6 7-6 | Hana Mandlikova | Match data |
| Nov 22, 1985* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Hana Mandlikova | 6-3 6-0 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hana Mandlikova | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |