H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Hana Mandlikova vs Laura Golarsa H2H: 3-0
Hana Mandlikova holds a 3–0 lead over Laura Golarsa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1989 Brighton fourth round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 1989* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Hana Mandlikova | 7-5 6-3 | Laura Golarsa | Match data |
| Oct 20, 1989* | Zurich | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Hana Mandlikova | 6-3 7-6 | Laura Golarsa | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1989* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Hana Mandlikova | 7-6(0) 0-6 6-1 | Laura Golarsa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
| Laura Golarsa | #693 | #39 | 436 | 1,761 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hana Mandlikova | Laura Golarsa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #121 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #79 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 | 1989 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #58 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 | 1990 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #61 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 | 1991 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #213 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 | 1993 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 | 1994 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #112 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #149 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #168 | 1,513 | 0 | 1 |