H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Hana Mandlikova vs Lisa Bonder Kreiss H2H: 4-0
Hana Mandlikova holds a 4–0 lead over Lisa Bonder Kreiss in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 3–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1988 Oakland third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 1988* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Hana Mandlikova | 6-3 6-2 | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Match data |
| Mar 29, 1984* | Boston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Hana Mandlikova | 6-2 6-3 | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Match data |
| Feb 2, 1984* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Hana Mandlikova | 7-6 3-6 6-1 | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1981* | Detroit | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Hana Mandlikova | 6-1 6-1 | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | — | — | — | 1,928 | 148 | 131 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hana Mandlikova | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 28–15 | 65.1% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,885 | 0 | 5 |
| 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 | 1984 | 31–19 | 62.0% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 5 |
| 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 | 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 |
| 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 | 1986 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 5 |
| 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 | 1987 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 5 |
| 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 | 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 5 |
| 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 5 |
| 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 5 |
| 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 | 1991 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 5 |
| 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |