H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Hana Mandlikova vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 6-1

Hana Mandlikova holds a 6–1 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 3–0 on grass and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1988 Australian Open fourth round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hana Mandlikova
AUS Age 64 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 20, 1988* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Hana Mandlikova #5 6-2 6-4 Lori Mcneil #11 Match data
Mar 28, 1987* Princeton WTA 250 SF Carpet Lori Mcneil #13 (w/o) Hana Mandlikova #4 Match data
Jan 23, 1987* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Grass Hana Mandlikova #4 6-0 6-0 Lori Mcneil #13 Match data
Nov 8, 1986* Worcester WTA 250 QF Hard Hana Mandlikova #4 6-4 6-2 Lori Mcneil #18 Match data
Jul 4, 1986* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Hana Mandlikova #4 6-7 6-0 6-2 Lori Mcneil #77 Match data
Nov 21, 1985* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Grass Hana Mandlikova #3 6-2 6-2 Lori Mcneil #90 Match data
Sep 5, 1984* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Hana Mandlikova #3 3-6 6-4 6-2 Lori Mcneil #111 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Hana Mandlikova #31 #3 157 2,299 516 191 73.0% 4 0 0 3 18 25
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hana Mandlikova Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1978 22–8 73.3% — 1,750 0 1 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1979 36–14 72.0% — 1,985 0 5 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1980 76–17 81.7% — 2,230 1 11 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1981 56–24 70.0% — 2,108 2 14 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1982 35–19 64.8% — 1,998 2 14 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1983 44–21 67.7% — 1,977 2 14 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1984 47–11 81.0% #3 2,081 2 19 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1985 53–13 80.3% #3 2,210 3 22 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1986 44–15 74.6% #4 2,233 3 22 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1987 47–13 78.3% #5 2,136 4 25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1988 15–7 68.2% #29 2,031 4 25 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 1989 33–19 63.5% #14 1,941 4 25 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1990 8–9 47.1% #31 1,809 4 25 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11