H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Hana Mandlikova vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 1-0

Hana Mandlikova holds a 1–0 lead over Mareen Louie Harper in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hana Mandlikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1981 Mahwah round of 16 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hana Mandlikova
AUS Age 64 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Mareen Louie Harper
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hana Mandlikova 6-2 7-5 Mareen Louie Harper Match data Aug 28, 1981* R16 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hana Mandlikova — #3 157 2,316 518 193 72.9% 4 0 0 6 17 27
Mareen Louie Harper — — — 1,911 179 240 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hana Mandlikova Mareen Louie Harper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
15 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,521 0 0
16 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,758 0 2 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,519 0 0
17 1979 37–14 72.5% — 1,991 0 7 1978 9–13 40.9% — 1,599 0 0
18 1980 76–17 81.7% #4 2,237 1 13 1979 4–13 23.5% — 1,575 0 0
19 1981 56–25 69.1% #5 2,128 2 16 1980 22–23 48.9% — 1,719 0 0
20 1982 35–19 64.8% #7 2,027 2 16 1981 16–20 44.4% — 1,745 0 0
21 1983 44–21 67.7% — 1,983 2 16 1982 9–18 33.3% — 1,656 0 0
22 1984 47–11 81.0% #3 2,085 2 21 1983 7–10 41.2% — 1,672 0 0
23 1985 53–14 79.1% #3 2,211 3 24 1984 18–17 51.4% — 1,734 0 1
24 1986 44–15 74.6% #4 2,242 3 24 1985 29–18 61.7% — 1,777 0 2
25 1987 47–13 78.3% #5 2,157 4 27 1986 12–17 41.4% — 1,680 0 2
26 1988 15–7 68.2% #29 2,045 4 27 1987 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 2
27 1989 33–19 63.5% #14 1,946 4 27 1988 12–17 41.4% — 1,613 0 2
28 1990 8–9 47.1% — 1,810 4 27 1989 6–14 30.0% — 1,576 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1990 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1991 12–16 42.9% — 1,614 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,545 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,537 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hana Mandlikova Mareen Louie Harper
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1979 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 23 4 27 85.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 1978 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 19 5 24 79.2% 18 3 21 85.7% 20 5 25 80.0% 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1981 11 4 15 73.3% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 22 13 35 62.9% 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 11 18 38.9%
20 1982 11 5 16 68.8% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1981 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4%
21 1983 12 4 16 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 1982 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
22 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 27 2 29 93.1% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1985 22 5 27 81.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 14 2 16 87.5% 1984 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1986 7 2 9 77.8% 11 3 14 78.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
25 1987 14 5 19 73.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 1 13 92.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 1986 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3%
26 1988 11 4 15 73.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1989 19 9 28 67.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1988 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1989 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 143 55 198 72.2% 119 47 166 71.7% 116 36 152 76.3% 133 52 185 71.9% — 106 119 225 47.1% 10 16 26 38.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 47 78 125 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hana Mandlikova Mareen Louie Harper
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1524 102.4 — — — — +72 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 1–0 — +0.56
15 1977 1492 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — 0.00 1976 1522 100.6 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.37
16 1978 1759 142.2 — — — — — -127 -39 71.4% +1.84 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 104.0 +1.40 1977 1520 116.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.35
17 1979 1991 150.8 — — — — -305 -197 +5 67.6% +1.46 8–3 (73%) 5–6 (45%) 107.5 -0.89 1978 1599 122.7 — — — — +32 -41 — 39.2% -0.96 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 107.4 +0.50
18 1980 2238 169.1 — — — — -86 -220 -74 77.5% +2.09 15–12 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 107.9 -9.35 1979 1576 121.8 — — — — +27 — — 30.0% -1.90 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.40
19 1981 2129 169.7 — — — — -47 -13 +79 69.9% +1.55 7–4 (64%) 5–6 (45%) 100.5 -7.13 1980 1719 129.4 — — — — -38 -158 -41 46.2% -0.59 12–4 (75%) 2–6 (25%) 107.4 +1.11
20 1982 2027 155.4 — — — — +43 +110 +36 60.3% +0.61 12–5 (71%) 6–5 (55%) 101.1 -5.96 1981 1746 134.8 — — — — -2 — -75 42.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) 104.9 -1.67
21 1983 1984 163.7 — — — — +67 +169 +26 70.3% +1.45 3–9 (25%) 7–1 (88%) 95.7 -3.62 1982 1656 125.3 — — — — -25 -46 — 35.5% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -1.44
22 1984 2085 166.1 — — — — +42 +34 -16 76.7% +2.05 10–5 (67%) 8–4 (67%) 103.0 -2.48 1983 1672 132.3 — — — — -12 — — 42.9% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.3 -0.96
23 1985 2211 170.8 — — — — +71 -92 -92 75.0% +1.78 9–5 (64%) 12–3 (80%) 109.1 -5.37 1984 1734 127.7 — — — — +24 — -95 48.8% -0.05 7–3 (70%) 2–3 (40%) 105.0 +0.48
24 1986 2242 175.0 — — — — +27 -50 -79 70.7% +1.50 10–5 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 98.7 -6.69 1985 1778 143.9 — — — — +52 — -156 58.5% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 101.8 -0.23
25 1987 2157 169.0 — — — — +17 +18 +141 75.8% +1.97 9–3 (75%) 7–4 (64%) 102.5 -3.70 1986 1680 121.3 — — — — +20 — -64 39.1% -0.55 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 +1.36
26 1988 2046 145.0 — — — — +89 +59 +204 65.3% +1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 93.6 -0.30 1987 1624 119.6 — — — — +7 — -16 38.6% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.21
27 1989 1946 155.2 — — — — +75 +101 +225 57.5% +0.38 15–3 (83%) 9–3 (75%) 105.4 -3.66 1988 1614 129.2 — — — — +12 — — 43.3% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -0.37
28 1990 1811 125.0 — — — — +120 +175 +361 51.4% +0.19 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.31 1989 1577 117.4 — — — — -17 — -22 32.0% -1.38 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 107.4 -1.28
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1591 128.5 — — — — +9 — — 45.8% -0.14 2–7 (22%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 +0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1615 127.2 — — — — -4 — -50 39.4% -0.53 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.46
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1545 105.5 — — — — -7 — — 25.0% -1.81 0–2 1–0 — -0.11
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1537 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
Career — 2317 169.5 — — — — +11 -15 +16 70.1% +1.51 107–63 (63%) 76–52 (59%) 107.1 -6.75 — 1911 135.4 — — — — +8 -84 -60 42.6% -0.56 76–57 (57%) 41–42 (49%) 107.5 -0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.