H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Hana Mandlikova vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 1-0
Hana Mandlikova holds a 1–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hana Mandlikova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1987 Princeton fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 1987* | Princeton | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Hana Mandlikova | 6-1 6-3 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hana Mandlikova | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |