H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Hana Mandlikova vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 3-0
Hana Mandlikova holds a 3–0 lead over Mary Joe Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1989 Sydney quarterfinal 2-6 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1989* | Sydney | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Hana Mandlikova | 2-6 7-6 6-3 | Mary Joe Fernandez | Match data |
| May 29, 1985* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Hana Mandlikova | 6-1 7-5 | Mary Joe Fernandez | Match data |
| Feb 9, 1985* | Delray Beach | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Hana Mandlikova | 6-3 6-0 | Mary Joe Fernandez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
| Mary Joe Fernandez | #136 | #4 | 2,114 | 2,191 | 409 | 192 | 68.1% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hana Mandlikova | Mary Joe Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #20 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,977 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 | 1990 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 | 1991 | 47–18 | 72.3% | #8 | 2,062 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 | 1992 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,108 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 | 1993 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #7 | 2,054 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 | 1994 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #14 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 | 1995 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #8 | 2,038 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 | 1996 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #16 | 1,926 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 | 1997 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #10 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 | 1998 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,932 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 | 1999 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #38 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,869 | 0 | 7 |