H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Hana Mandlikova vs Mary Lou Piatek H2H: 5-0
Hana Mandlikova holds a 5–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1983 Mahwah third round 7-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5
–
0
5 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 1983* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Hana Mandlikova | 7-6 6-0 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Mar 4, 1983* | Palm Springs | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Hana Mandlikova | 6-0 6-2 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1981* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Hana Mandlikova | 6-7 7-6 6-3 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Apr 23, 1981* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Hana Mandlikova | 6-0 6-1 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Feb 20, 1981* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Hana Mandlikova | 3-6 7-5 6-2 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hana Mandlikova | Mary Lou Piatek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 | 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 | 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 | 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 | 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 |
| 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 | 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 | 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 |
| 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 | 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 | 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |