H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Hana Mandlikova vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 4-1

Hana Mandlikova holds a 4–1 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1990 Boca Raton round of 32 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hana Mandlikova
AUS Age 64 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hana Mandlikova #19 6-3 6-0 Nathalie Herreman #118 Match data Mar 8, 1990* R32 Boca Raton Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Hana Mandlikova #29 6-3 6-3 Nathalie Herreman #95 Match data Jan 12, 1989* R32 Sydney International WTA 500 Hard
Hana Mandlikova #4 6-3 7-5 Nathalie Herreman #82 Match data Oct 28, 1987* R32 Zurich WTA 250 Carpet
Hana Mandlikova #4 6-1 6-3 Nathalie Herreman #65 Match data Sep 3, 1987* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Nathalie Herreman #60 6-4 7-6(5) Hana Mandlikova #4 Match data May 28, 1987* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hana Mandlikova #31 #3 157 2,315 518 191 73.1% 4 0 0 4 19 27
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hana Mandlikova Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,758 0 2 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1979 37–14 72.5% — 1,990 0 7 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
18 1980 76–17 81.7% #4 2,235 1 13 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
19 1981 56–24 70.0% #5 2,127 2 16 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
20 1982 35–19 64.8% #7 2,025 2 16 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
21 1983 44–21 67.7% — 1,982 2 16 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
22 1984 47–11 81.0% #3 2,084 2 21 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
23 1985 53–13 80.3% #3 2,213 3 24 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1986 44–15 74.6% #4 2,242 3 24 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
25 1987 47–13 78.3% #5 2,156 4 27 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
26 1988 15–7 68.2% #29 2,045 4 27 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1989 33–19 63.5% #14 1,945 4 27 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
28 1990 8–9 47.1% #31 1,810 4 27 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hana Mandlikova Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1979 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 23 4 27 85.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 19 5 24 79.2% 18 3 21 85.7% 20 5 25 80.0% 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1981 11 3 14 78.6% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 22 13 35 62.9% 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1982 11 5 16 68.8% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1983 12 4 16 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 27 2 29 93.1% 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1985 22 5 27 81.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 14 2 16 87.5% 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1986 7 2 9 77.8% 11 3 14 78.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1987 14 5 19 73.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 1 13 92.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1988 11 4 15 73.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1989 19 9 28 67.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 143 54 197 72.6% 119 46 165 72.1% 116 36 152 76.3% 133 52 185 71.9% — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hana Mandlikova Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1977 1492 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1978 1759 142.2 — — — — — -128 -39 71.4% +1.84 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 104.0 +1.62 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 1979 1991 150.7 — — — — -306 -198 +6 67.9% +1.46 9–3 (75%) 5–6 (45%) 108.6 -0.72 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
18 1980 2235 168.8 — — — — -89 -219 -70 77.5% +2.09 15–12 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 107.8 -9.15 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
19 1981 2127 168.7 — — — — -45 -13 +80 70.8% +1.60 7–4 (64%) 5–6 (45%) 100.4 -6.49 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
20 1982 2025 155.2 — — — — +44 +111 +37 60.3% +0.61 12–5 (71%) 6–5 (55%) 101.1 -6.83 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
21 1983 1983 163.6 — — — — +67 +169 +26 70.3% +1.45 3–9 (25%) 7–1 (88%) 95.7 -3.35 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
22 1984 2084 165.9 — — — — +42 +34 -16 76.7% +2.05 10–5 (67%) 8–4 (67%) 103.0 -1.62 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
23 1985 2213 169.9 — — — — +68 -92 -93 76.0% +1.84 9–5 (64%) 12–3 (80%) 109.1 -4.75 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
24 1986 2242 174.9 — — — — +26 -48 -79 70.7% +1.50 10–5 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 98.7 -6.78 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
25 1987 2156 168.9 — — — — +16 +20 +142 75.8% +1.97 9–3 (75%) 7–4 (64%) 102.5 -3.19 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
26 1988 2045 145.0 — — — — +89 +61 +204 65.3% +1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 93.6 -0.30 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
27 1989 1946 155.1 — — — — +75 +103 +225 57.5% +0.38 15–3 (83%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 -3.52 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
28 1990 1810 125.0 — — — — +120 +176 +361 51.4% +0.19 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.31 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
Career — 2316 169.2 — — — — +11 -14 +17 70.3% +1.52 108–63 (63%) 76–52 (59%) 107.2 -6.38 — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.