H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Hana Mandlikova vs Pam Casale H2H: 2-1
Hana Mandlikova holds a 2–1 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Hana Mandlikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1984 Marco Island fourth round 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 1984* | Marco Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Pam Casale | 7-6 7-6 | Hana Mandlikova | Match data |
| May 8, 1982* | Perugia | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Hana Mandlikova | 6-4 7-6 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1981* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Hana Mandlikova | 6-2 6-2 | Pam Casale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hana Mandlikova | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |