H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Hana Mandlikova vs Pam Shriver H2H: 7-2

Hana Mandlikova holds a 7–2 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 5–2 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1987 Brisbane International final 6-2 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hana Mandlikova
AUS Age 64 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
7 – 2
9 main-draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hana Mandlikova #4 6-2 2-6 6-4 Pam Shriver #5 Match data Jan 4, 1987* F Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass
Pam Shriver #6 4-6 7-5 6-1 Hana Mandlikova #4 Match data Nov 17, 1986 QF WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Hana Mandlikova #4 6-4 3-6 7-5 Pam Shriver #6 Match data Nov 15, 1986* SF Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Hana Mandlikova #4 6-4 6-3 Pam Shriver #3 Match data Mar 24, 1984* SF Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Shriver #3 6-3 7-6 Hana Mandlikova #6 Match data Feb 28, 1984 QF WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Hana Mandlikova #9 6-2 6-3 Pam Shriver #4 Match data Jan 14, 1984* SF Oakland WTA 250 Carpet
Hana Mandlikova 6-4 2-6 6-2 Pam Shriver Match data Sep 12, 1982* SF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Hana Mandlikova 6-2 7-6(3) Pam Shriver Match data Mar 22, 1981 RR WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Hana Mandlikova 6-0 6-2 Pam Shriver Match data Feb 7, 1981* SF Detroit WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hana Mandlikova — #3 157 2,316 518 193 72.9% 4 0 0 6 17 27
Pam Shriver — #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 6 18 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hana Mandlikova Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1
16 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,758 0 2 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,814 0 1
17 1979 37–14 72.5% — 1,991 0 7 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,057 0 2
18 1980 76–17 81.7% #4 2,237 1 13 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,140 0 4
19 1981 56–25 69.1% #5 2,128 2 16 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,100 0 5
20 1982 35–19 64.8% #7 2,027 2 16 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,164 0 8
21 1983 44–21 67.7% — 1,983 2 16 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,061 0 10
22 1984 47–11 81.0% #3 2,085 2 21 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,119 0 14
23 1985 53–14 79.1% #3 2,211 3 24 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16
24 1986 44–15 74.6% #4 2,242 3 24 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,256 0 20
25 1987 47–13 78.3% #5 2,157 4 27 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24
26 1988 15–7 68.2% #29 2,045 4 27 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24
27 1989 33–19 63.5% #14 1,946 4 27 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24
28 1990 8–9 47.1% — 1,810 4 27 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24
29 — — — — — — — 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24
30 — — — — — — — 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 — — — — — — — 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,700 0 24
32 — — — — — — — 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 — — — — — — — 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% — 1,635 0 24

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hana Mandlikova Pam Shriver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
16 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
17 1979 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 23 4 27 85.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 19 5 24 79.2% 18 3 21 85.7% 20 5 25 80.0% 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5%
19 1981 11 4 15 73.3% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 22 13 35 62.9% 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7%
20 1982 11 5 16 68.8% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4%
21 1983 12 4 16 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0%
22 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 27 2 29 93.1% 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6%
23 1985 22 5 27 81.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 14 2 16 87.5% 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9%
24 1986 7 2 9 77.8% 11 3 14 78.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3%
25 1987 14 5 19 73.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 1 13 92.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2%
26 1988 11 4 15 73.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1989 19 9 28 67.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
28 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 143 55 198 72.2% 119 47 166 71.7% 116 36 152 76.3% 133 52 185 71.9% — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hana Mandlikova Pam Shriver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1977 1492 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — 0.00 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +102 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.78
16 1978 1759 142.2 — — — — — -127 -39 71.4% +1.84 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 104.0 +1.40 1979 1815 147.6 — — — — +5 — -40 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.2 -0.54
17 1979 1991 150.8 — — — — -305 -197 +5 67.6% +1.46 8–3 (73%) 5–6 (45%) 107.5 -0.89 1980 2057 163.7 — — — — -46 -407 -68 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 105.0 -7.43
18 1980 2238 169.1 — — — — -86 -220 -74 77.5% +2.09 15–12 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 107.9 -9.35 1981 2140 166.7 — — — — -89 -333 -10 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.71
19 1981 2129 169.7 — — — — -47 -13 +79 69.9% +1.55 7–4 (64%) 5–6 (45%) 100.5 -7.13 1982 2100 162.2 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.30
20 1982 2027 155.4 — — — — +43 +110 +36 60.3% +0.61 12–5 (71%) 6–5 (55%) 101.1 -5.96 1983 2164 167.9 — — — — +34 -322 +15 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.97
21 1983 1984 163.7 — — — — +67 +169 +26 70.3% +1.45 3–9 (25%) 7–1 (88%) 95.7 -3.62 1984 2061 163.7 — — — — +77 — +83 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.72
22 1984 2085 166.1 — — — — +42 +34 -16 76.7% +2.05 10–5 (67%) 8–4 (67%) 103.0 -2.48 1985 2119 161.3 — — — — +48 -302 +86 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 -0.54
23 1985 2211 170.8 — — — — +71 -92 -92 75.0% +1.78 9–5 (64%) 12–3 (80%) 109.1 -5.37 1986 2197 175.3 — — — — +22 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -5.27
24 1986 2242 175.0 — — — — +27 -50 -79 70.7% +1.50 10–5 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 98.7 -6.69 1987 2256 167.5 — — — — 0 — +38 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.72
25 1987 2157 169.0 — — — — +17 +18 +141 75.8% +1.97 9–3 (75%) 7–4 (64%) 102.5 -3.70 1988 2198 167.6 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.89
26 1988 2046 145.0 — — — — +89 +59 +204 65.3% +1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 93.6 -0.30 1989 1961 141.1 — — — — +38 — +227 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.50
27 1989 1946 155.2 — — — — +75 +101 +225 57.5% +0.38 15–3 (83%) 9–3 (75%) 105.4 -3.66 1990 1915 136.2 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41
28 1990 1811 125.0 — — — — +120 +175 +361 51.4% +0.19 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.31 1991 1823 146.7 — — — — -5 — +350 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.31
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +5 — +301 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1650 116.2 — — — — -3 — +276 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -19 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20
Career — 2317 169.5 — — — — +11 -15 +16 70.1% +1.51 107–63 (63%) 76–52 (59%) 107.1 -6.75 — 2304 166.7 — — — — +10 -332 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.