H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Hana Mandlikova vs Radomira Zrubakova H2H: 2-1
Hana Mandlikova holds a 2–1 lead over Radomira Zrubakova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 1–0 on carpet, while Radomira Zrubakova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1989 Zurich third round 4-6 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 55
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 1989* | Zurich | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Hana Mandlikova | 4-6 7-5 6-1 | Radomira Zrubakova | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Hana Mandlikova | 7-5 6-3 | Radomira Zrubakova | Match data |
| May 13, 1988* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Radomira Zrubakova | 7-6 7-5 | Hana Mandlikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
| Radomira Zrubakova | #788 | #22 | 324 | 1,896 | 171 | 155 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hana Mandlikova | Radomira Zrubakova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #32 | 1,807 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #57 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 | 1991 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 | 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 | 1993 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 | 1994 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |