H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Hana Mandlikova vs Sophie Amiach H2H: 1-0

Hana Mandlikova holds a 1–0 lead over Sophie Amiach in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hana Mandlikova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1981 Monaco quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hana Mandlikova
AUS Age 64 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Sophie Amiach
FRA Age 62 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hana Mandlikova 6-3 6-2 Sophie Amiach Match data Jul 25, 1981* QF Monaco WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hana Mandlikova #31 #3 157 2,315 518 191 73.1% 4 0 0 4 19 27
Sophie Amiach #577 #57 9 1,647 57 93 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hana Mandlikova Sophie Amiach
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,758 0 2 1980 10–5 66.7% — 1,554 0 0
17 1979 37–14 72.5% — 1,990 0 7 1981 6–6 50.0% — 1,609 0 0
18 1980 76–17 81.7% #4 2,235 1 13 1982 8–8 50.0% — 1,585 0 0
19 1981 56–24 70.0% #5 2,127 2 16 1983 3–6 33.3% — 1,597 0 0
20 1982 35–19 64.8% #7 2,025 2 16 1984 12–15 44.4% #76 1,627 0 0
21 1983 44–21 67.7% — 1,982 2 16 1985 5–15 25.0% #121 1,531 0 0
22 1984 47–11 81.0% #3 2,084 2 21 1986 1–4 20.0% #173 1,514 0 0
23 1985 53–13 80.3% #3 2,213 3 24 — — — — — — —
24 1986 44–15 74.6% #4 2,242 3 24 1988 0–1 0.0% #213 1,512 0 0
25 1987 47–13 78.3% #5 2,156 4 27 1989 7–13 35.0% #129 1,555 0 0
26 1988 15–7 68.2% #29 2,045 4 27 1990 2–6 25.0% #227 1,529 0 0
27 1989 33–19 63.5% #14 1,945 4 27 1991 1–2 33.3% #243 1,517 0 0
28 1990 8–9 47.1% #31 1,810 4 27 1992 0–2 0.0% #241 1,501 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1993 2–7 22.2% #199 1,477 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #233 1,471 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 1995 0–2 0.0% #446 1,459 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hana Mandlikova Sophie Amiach
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 1980 — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
17 1979 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 23 4 27 85.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 1981 — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 19 5 24 79.2% 18 3 21 85.7% 20 5 25 80.0% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — —
19 1981 11 3 14 78.6% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 22 13 35 62.9% 1983 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1982 11 5 16 68.8% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1983 12 4 16 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 1985 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 27 2 29 93.1% 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1985 22 5 27 81.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 14 2 16 87.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1986 7 2 9 77.8% 11 3 14 78.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1987 14 5 19 73.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 1 13 92.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 1989 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1988 11 4 15 73.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 1989 19 9 28 67.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 143 54 197 72.6% 119 46 165 72.1% 116 36 152 76.3% 133 52 185 71.9% — 13 26 39 33.3% 27 32 59 45.8% 16 22 38 42.1% 1 11 12 8.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hana Mandlikova Sophie Amiach
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1977 1492 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1978 1759 142.2 — — — — — -128 -39 71.4% +1.84 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 104.0 +1.62 1980 1555 115.8 — — — — — +54 +8 73.1% +1.85 1–1 — — +2.63
17 1979 1991 150.7 — — — — -306 -198 +6 67.9% +1.46 9–3 (75%) 5–6 (45%) 108.6 -0.72 1981 1610 112.9 — — — — — +92 — 46.4% -0.14 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — +0.13
18 1980 2235 168.8 — — — — -89 -219 -70 77.5% +2.09 15–12 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 107.8 -9.15 1982 1585 105.8 — — — — — +68 — 50.0% -0.31 2–2 (50%) 2–0 — +1.61
19 1981 2127 168.7 — — — — -45 -13 +80 70.8% +1.60 7–4 (64%) 5–6 (45%) 100.4 -6.49 1983 1598 109.9 — — — — — — +20 33.3% -1.05 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.14
20 1982 2025 155.2 — — — — +44 +111 +37 60.3% +0.61 12–5 (71%) 6–5 (55%) 101.1 -6.83 1984 1627 116.0 — — — — -64 -4 +40 44.6% -0.48 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.9 +2.43
21 1983 1983 163.6 — — — — +67 +169 +26 70.3% +1.45 3–9 (25%) 7–1 (88%) 95.7 -3.35 1985 1532 102.5 — — — — -35 — +91 33.3% -1.58 2–6 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.1 +1.91
22 1984 2084 165.9 — — — — +42 +34 -16 76.7% +2.05 10–5 (67%) 8–4 (67%) 103.0 -1.62 1986 1515 102.1 — — — — -16 — — 33.3% -1.84 0–2 2–0 — +0.03
23 1985 2213 169.9 — — — — +68 -92 -93 76.0% +1.84 9–5 (64%) 12–3 (80%) 109.1 -4.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1986 2242 174.9 — — — — +26 -48 -79 70.7% +1.50 10–5 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 98.7 -6.78 1988 1513 105.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.18
25 1987 2156 168.9 — — — — +16 +20 +142 75.8% +1.97 9–3 (75%) 7–4 (64%) 102.5 -3.19 1989 1555 119.2 — — — — -84 +17 +75 35.4% -1.08 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 104.3 -0.56
26 1988 2045 145.0 — — — — +89 +61 +204 65.3% +1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 93.6 -0.30 1990 1530 102.1 — — — — — +28 +77 22.2% -2.67 2–0 1–1 — -0.10
27 1989 1946 155.1 — — — — +75 +103 +225 57.5% +0.38 15–3 (83%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 -3.52 1991 1518 104.5 — — — — -43 — — 33.3% -0.50 — — — +0.39
28 1990 1810 125.0 — — — — +120 +176 +361 51.4% +0.19 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.31 1992 1501 105.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — -0.09
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1477 104.3 — — — — -4 — — 30.0% -1.30 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.23
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1472 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.02
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1460 106.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 1–0 — -0.14
Career — 2316 169.2 — — — — +11 -14 +17 70.3% +1.52 108–63 (63%) 76–52 (59%) 107.2 -6.38 — 1647 115.8 — — — — -47 +49 +50 40.4% -0.80 20–24 (45%) 16–12 (57%) 102.7 +5.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.