H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Hana Mandlikova vs Vicki Nelson H2H: 3-0
Hana Mandlikova holds a 3–0 lead over Vicki Nelson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1988 Key Biscayne first round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1988* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R128 | Hard | Hana Mandlikova | 6-1 6-0 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1985* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Hana Mandlikova | 7-6 6-2 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
| Sep 8, 1982* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Hana Mandlikova | 6-4 6-2 | Vicki Nelson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
| Vicki Nelson | #547 | #60 | 8 | 1,679 | 87 | 136 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hana Mandlikova | Vicki Nelson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 | 1983 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 | 1984 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #92 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 | 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 | 1986 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #98 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 | 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #136 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #402 | 1,461 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |