H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Hana Mandlikova vs Wiltrud Probst H2H: 1-0
Hana Mandlikova holds a 1–0 lead over Wiltrud Probst in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hana Mandlikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1988 Key Biscayne second round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 1988* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Hana Mandlikova | 6-1 7-5 | Wiltrud Probst | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,757 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hana Mandlikova | Wiltrud Probst | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 | 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 | 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 | 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 | 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 | 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 | 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |