H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Hana Strachonova vs Anne Hobbs H2H: 1-2
Anne Hobbs holds a 2–1 lead over Hana Strachonova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anne Hobbs leads 1–0 on carpet, while Hana Strachonova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hana Strachonova won the 1981 Lugano fourth round 2-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 65
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 1981* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Hana Strachonova | 2-6 6-2 6-2 | Anne Hobbs | Match data |
| Jun 21, 1978* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Anne Hobbs | 2-6 6-3 6-0 | Hana Strachonova | Match data |
| Feb 11, 1977* | Copenhagen | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Anne Hobbs | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | Hana Strachonova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Strachonova | — | — | — | 1,757 | 54 | 69 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anne Hobbs | #583 | #35 | 18 | 1,842 | 174 | 164 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hana Strachonova | Anne Hobbs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1977 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1978 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 26–14 | 65.0% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1980 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1981 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1982 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,736 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,777 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,679 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #42 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,609 | 0 | 8 |