H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Hana Strachonova vs Tanya Harford H2H: 1-1

Hana Strachonova and Tanya Harford are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tanya Harford leads 1–0 on carpet, while Hana Strachonova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hana Strachonova won the 1982 Lugano round of 64 7-5 7-5.

H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings
RSA Age 67 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hana Strachonova 7-5 7-5 Tanya Harford Match data May 12, 1982* R64 Lugano WTA 250 Clay
Tanya Harford 6-7 7-6 6-0 Hana Strachonova Match data Nov 6, 1980* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hana Strachonova 1,756 54 69 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tanya Harford 1,784 50 71 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hana Strachonova Tanya Harford
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1974 0–1 0.0% 1,496 0 0
16 1977 3–5 37.5% 1,530 0 0 1975 0–1 0.0% 1,479 0 0
17 1978 16–16 50.0% 1,640 0 1 1976 4–5 44.4% 1,512 0 0
18 1979 4–8 33.3% 1,644 0 1 1977 7–13 35.0% 1,559 0 0
19 1980 15–15 50.0% 1,673 0 1 1978 3–6 33.3% 1,558 0 0
20 1981 11–13 45.8% 1,673 0 1 1979 13–10 56.5% 1,716 0 0
21 1982 3–7 30.0% 1,614 0 1 1980 12–20 37.5% 1,673 0 0
22 1983 2–5 28.6% 1,607 0 1 1981 8–10 44.4% 1,630 0 0
23 1982 3–5 37.5% 1,629 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hana Strachonova Tanya Harford
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1974 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1975 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1976 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1980 4 4 8 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 9 12 25.0%
22 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
Career 1 10 11 9.1% 29 29 58 50.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 10 15 25 40.0% 15 22 37 40.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 15 19 34 44.1% 8 15 23 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hana Strachonova Tanya Harford
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1974 1497 100.1 0.0% -3.50 -0.14
16 1977 1530 108.2 +63 +16 47.1% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 98.2 +1.02 1975 1479 94.2 0.0% -4.00 +0.26
17 1978 1641 118.5 -66 -42 -15 47.3% -0.27 7–3 (70%) 1–3 (25%) 104.4 +1.76 1976 1512 106.0 +67 +25 44.4% -0.61 0–2 1–0 +0.59
18 1979 1644 123.8 -39 -16 37.9% -1.21 3–2 (60%) 1–0 -0.42 1977 1559 123.8 +23 +25 -88 38.3% -0.58 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 98.8 +1.04
19 1980 1673 124.7 -85 +66 -82 47.1% -0.44 7–3 (70%) 3–4 (43%) 105.7 +0.59 1978 1559 111.9 +34 41.7% -0.71 2–4 (33%) 0–1 +0.55
20 1981 1673 126.4 -124 +148 43.1% -0.43 6–4 (60%) 4–3 (57%) 102.4 -1.27 1979 1716 133.6 -51 -60 51.8% -0.18 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 108.7 +1.24
21 1982 1615 100.4 +76 36.4% -1.36 2–2 (50%) -0.41 1980 1674 130.7 -52 -27 40.0% -0.81 5–6 (45%) 2–4 (33%) 98.1 -2.35
22 1983 1608 111.6 +123 29.4% -1.88 2–1 (67%) 1–1 -1.09 1981 1631 111.6 +32 -43 0 52.4% +0.12 2–6 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 97.4 +2.28
23 1982 1629 118.4 -65 +42 44.4% -0.44 0–2 1–2 (33%) -0.05
Career 1757 125.0 -57 +77 -26 43.6% -0.60 28–17 (62%) 11–14 (44%) 106.9 +0.15 1785 128.9 -15 -5 -32 44.0% -0.51 19–27 (41%) 12–14 (46%) 98.7 +2.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.