H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Heather Ludloff vs Adriana Villagran Reami H2H: 0-1
Adriana Villagran Reami holds a 1–0 lead over Heather Ludloff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Adriana Villagran Reami leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Adriana Villagran Reami won the 1987 San Diego second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 1987* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Adriana Villagran Reami | 6-3 6-1 | Heather Ludloff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heather Ludloff | #512 | #69 | 11 | 1,576 | 48 | 106 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Adriana Villagran Reami | — | — | — | 1,597 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Heather Ludloff | Adriana Villagran Reami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–25 | 34.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #219 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |