H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC
Heather Watson vs Julia Goerges H2H: 1-1
Heather Watson and Julia Goerges are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on clay, while Heather Watson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Heather Watson won the 2015 Indian Wells first round 6-4 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2015* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Heather Watson | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| May 30, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 6-3 6-4 | Heather Watson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heather Watson | #470 | #38 | 1,386 | 1,755 | 144 | 195 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Heather Watson | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #92 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #49 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #121 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #49 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #55 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #76 | 1,584 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #73 | 1,626 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #91 | 1,584 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,663 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #72 | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 2022 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,569 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #137 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |
| 2024 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #269 | 1,545 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,592 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |