H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Heather Watson vs Xinyun Han
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Heather Watson vs Xinyun Han.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heather Watson | #470 | #38 | 1,386 | 1,755 | 144 | 195 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Xinyun Han | #1,386 | #105 | 597 | 1,565 | 21 | 33 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Heather Watson | Xinyun Han | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #339 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #92 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #49 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #121 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #324 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #49 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #55 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #76 | 1,584 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #73 | 1,626 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #131 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #91 | 1,584 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #159 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #187 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,663 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #72 | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,569 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #137 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #269 | 1,545 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,592 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |