H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC

Heidi Eisterlehner vs Anne Hobbs H2H: 0-1

Anne Hobbs holds a 1–0 lead over Heidi Eisterlehner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Hobbs leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anne Hobbs won the 1980 Las Vegas Futures round of 32 6-3 3-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Heidi Eisterlehner
GER Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Anne Hobbs
GBR Age 67 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Hobbs 6-3 3-6 6-0 Heidi Eisterlehner Match data Jan 17, 1980* R32 Las Vegas Futures WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Heidi Eisterlehner — — — 1,769 114 130 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Anne Hobbs #583 #35 18 1,834 172 164 51.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Heidi Eisterlehner Anne Hobbs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1976 7–7 50.0% — 1,550 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1977 6–6 50.0% — 1,573 0 2
18 — — — — — — — 1978 23–13 63.9% — 1,720 0 3
19 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,486 0 0 1979 12–11 52.2% — 1,749 0 3
20 1970 3–3 50.0% — 1,507 0 0 1980 27–19 58.7% — 1,750 0 5
21 — — — — — — — 1981 22–18 55.0% — 1,824 0 5
22 1972 0–5 0.0% — 1,438 0 0 1982 8–13 38.1% — 1,727 0 6
23 1973 5–6 45.5% — 1,466 0 0 1983 18–19 48.6% — 1,751 0 7
24 1974 2–2 50.0% — 1,482 0 0 1984 14–14 50.0% #59 1,736 0 7
25 1975 13–9 59.1% — 1,666 0 2 1985 13–12 52.0% #63 1,777 0 8
26 1976 15–19 44.1% — 1,653 0 2 1986 6–14 30.0% #99 1,680 0 8
27 1977 11–15 42.3% — 1,612 0 2 1987 14–11 56.0% #42 1,714 0 8
28 1978 14–16 46.7% — 1,605 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1979 4–6 40.0% — 1,594 0 2 1989 2–7 22.2% #231 1,610 0 8
30 1980 27–18 60.0% — 1,706 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1981 7–12 36.8% — 1,637 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1982 10–12 45.5% — 1,548 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1983 1–2 33.3% — 1,552 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 1984 2–4 33.3% — 1,536 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Heidi Eisterlehner Anne Hobbs
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1969 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1970 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1972 — — — — 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 1973 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 7 11 36.4%
24 1974 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 1 4 5 20.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1975 — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1976 3 1 4 75.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0%
27 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 1980 2 1 3 66.7% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1981 — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 8 10 18 44.4% 72 73 145 49.7% 9 25 34 26.5% 23 19 42 54.8% — 19 31 50 38.0% 34 36 70 48.6% 71 50 121 58.7% 29 42 71 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Heidi Eisterlehner Anne Hobbs
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1551 106.9 — — — — +100 — — 50.0% -0.13 1–3 (25%) — — +2.73
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1574 106.1 — — — — +108 -76 — 44.8% -0.31 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.86
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1720 125.0 — — — — -15 — -73 59.5% +0.81 8–4 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 105.9 +1.71
19 1969 1486 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.13 1979 1750 138.2 — — — — -75 — -19 50.0% -0.20 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.4 -1.77
20 1970 1508 100.6 — — — — — +43 — 50.0% -0.92 — — — +0.52 1980 1751 132.6 — — — — -135 -50 -42 56.6% +0.60 8–6 (57%) 3–5 (38%) 100.8 -0.06
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1825 132.4 — — — — -131 -98 -24 51.6% +0.07 10–5 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.7 -2.46
22 1972 1439 91.1 — — — — — +19 — 9.1% -3.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.90 1982 1728 117.2 — — — — -111 -94 +65 43.4% -0.13 4–7 (36%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.53
23 1973 1466 102.3 — — — — — +30 — 44.0% -0.56 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.42 1983 1752 128.9 — — — — -65 -57 +25 47.7% -0.24 7–5 (58%) 4–4 (50%) 100.4 +0.44
24 1974 1483 100.4 — — — — — +33 — 40.0% -1.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.69 1984 1736 126.0 — — — — -107 -51 +109 50.7% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 4–1 (80%) 102.3 +0.68
25 1975 1667 123.4 — — — — — +28 -100 56.6% +0.36 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 104.4 +0.96 1985 1778 134.0 — — — — -157 — +123 51.9% -0.06 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.21
26 1976 1653 123.0 — — — — -39 +22 -101 47.4% -0.24 6–6 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 105.0 +1.14 1986 1680 122.2 — — — — -134 -59 +222 32.6% -1.09 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — -1.41
27 1977 1612 114.1 — — — — — +52 -147 38.6% -0.90 5–3 (63%) 4–4 (50%) 102.1 +0.40 1987 1715 125.8 — — — — -122 — +118 53.6% +0.21 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 97.9 +1.60
28 1978 1605 119.3 — — — — +79 +51 -122 49.3% -0.22 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 +3.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1979 1594 107.1 — — — — +95 — — 36.4% -1.36 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.2 +1.62 1989 1611 99.5 — — — — -110 — +183 30.4% -1.52 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +1.07
30 1980 1707 133.4 — — — — +8 +67 — 62.6% +0.85 5–8 (38%) 4–2 (67%) 98.7 +1.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1981 1637 110.6 — — — — +67 +56 — 42.2% -0.47 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — +2.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1982 1548 102.2 — — — — +97 +36 — 45.5% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 98.4 +2.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1983 1553 103.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 1–1 — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1984 1536 106.9 — — — — +81 — — 35.7% -1.29 1–1 — — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1769 120.8 — — — — +50 +43 -114 47.9% -0.29 38–42 (48%) 23–21 (52%) 99.5 +7.70 — 1834 133.0 — — — — -76 -67 +52 50.1% +0.01 63–54 (54%) 27–30 (47%) 100.4 +1.39

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.