H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Heidi Eisterlehner vs Ivanna Madruga H2H: 1-2

Ivanna Madruga holds a 2–1 lead over Heidi Eisterlehner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ivanna Madruga leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Ivanna Madruga won the 1982 Porto Alegre quarterfinal 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Heidi Eisterlehner
GER Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Ivanna Madruga
ARG Age 65

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ivanna Madruga 6-0 6-1 Heidi Eisterlehner Match data Apr 3, 1982* QF Porto Alegre WTA 250 Clay
Heidi Eisterlehner 6-3 4-6 6-1 Ivanna Madruga Match data Oct 18, 1980* QF Nagoya WTA 250 Clay
Ivanna Madruga 6-7 6-3 6-0 Heidi Eisterlehner Match data May 2, 1980* R32 Orlando WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Heidi Eisterlehner — — — 1,773 114 128 47.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Ivanna Madruga — — — 1,916 131 88 59.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Heidi Eisterlehner Ivanna Madruga
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1978 6–6 50.0% — 1,555 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1979 7–10 41.2% — 1,628 0 0
19 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,486 0 0 1980 29–18 61.7% — 1,799 0 0
20 1970 3–3 50.0% — 1,507 0 0 1981 17–14 54.8% — 1,752 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1982 27–13 67.5% — 1,822 0 1
22 1972 0–5 0.0% — 1,438 0 0 1983 25–12 67.6% — 1,881 0 1
23 1973 5–6 45.5% — 1,466 0 0 1984 14–8 63.6% — 1,830 0 1
24 1974 2–2 50.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1975 13–9 59.1% — 1,666 0 2 1986 5–5 50.0% — 1,775 0 1
26 1976 15–19 44.1% — 1,652 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 1977 11–15 42.3% — 1,611 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 1978 14–15 48.3% — 1,608 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1979 4–6 40.0% — 1,596 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1980 27–17 61.4% — 1,709 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1981 7–12 36.8% — 1,638 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1982 10–12 45.5% — 1,548 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1983 1–2 33.3% — 1,553 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 1984 2–4 33.3% — 1,536 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Heidi Eisterlehner Ivanna Madruga
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1969 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 10 6 16 62.5% 19 8 27 70.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1970 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 2 3 5 40.0% 25 10 35 71.4% — — — — — — — —
22 1972 — — — — 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 17 8 25 68.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1973 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 — — — — 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — — — — —
24 1974 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1975 — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1976 3 1 4 75.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1978 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1980 2 1 3 66.7% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1981 — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 8 9 17 47.1% 72 73 145 49.7% 9 25 34 26.5% 23 18 41 56.1% — 22 18 40 55.0% 99 53 152 65.1% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Heidi Eisterlehner Ivanna Madruga
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1505 101.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.30
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.22
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1556 122.4 — — — — — +14 — 55.2% +0.10 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — +0.29
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1628 139.2 — — — — +21 -20 -52 45.0% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 97.3 -0.36
19 1969 1486 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.13 1980 1799 145.3 — — — — -111 +67 — 59.8% +1.16 9–3 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 106.3 -5.59
20 1970 1508 100.6 — — — — — +43 — 50.0% -0.92 — — — +0.52 1981 1752 140.7 — — — — -101 +165 -157 55.6% +0.39 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 100.1 -2.27
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1822 151.7 — — — — -199 +149 — 64.4% +1.49 6–4 (60%) 1–1 — -2.76
22 1972 1439 91.1 — — — — — +19 — 9.1% -3.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.90 1983 1882 143.6 — — — — -151 +78 — 65.9% +1.35 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 +0.61
23 1973 1466 102.3 — — — — — +30 — 44.0% -0.56 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.42 1984 1830 128.9 — — — — — +30 — 63.3% +1.12 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.18
24 1974 1483 100.4 — — — — — +33 — 40.0% -1.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1975 1667 123.4 — — — — — +28 -100 56.6% +0.36 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 104.4 +0.92 1986 1776 112.3 — — — — — +16 — 45.5% -0.23 2–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.28
26 1976 1653 123.0 — — — — -39 +22 -102 47.4% -0.24 6–6 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 105.0 +0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1977 1612 114.0 — — — — — +52 -149 38.6% -0.90 5–3 (63%) 4–4 (50%) 102.1 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1978 1608 119.9 — — — — +85 +48 -126 50.8% -0.09 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 +3.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1979 1596 107.1 — — — — +100 — — 36.4% -1.36 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.1 +1.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1980 1709 134.1 — — — — +20 +64 — 63.5% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 99.8 +1.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1981 1638 110.6 — — — — +76 +55 — 42.2% -0.47 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — +2.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1982 1548 102.3 — — — — +106 +36 — 45.5% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 98.4 +2.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1983 1553 102.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 1–1 — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1984 1536 106.8 — — — — +87 — — 35.7% -1.29 1–1 — — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1773 121.0 — — — — +58 +42 -116 48.2% -0.26 38–41 (48%) 23–21 (52%) 99.9 +7.72 — 1917 148.0 — — — — -116 +85 -109 59.2% +0.89 30–28 (52%) 12–18 (40%) 98.1 -4.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.