H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Helen Gourlay vs Fiorella Bonicelli H2H: 3-0

Helen Gourlay holds a 3–0 lead over Fiorella Bonicelli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Helen Gourlay leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Helen Gourlay won the 1975 Westchester round of 64 6-2 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Helen Gourlay
AUS Age 79
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Fiorella Bonicelli
URU Age 74

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Helen Gourlay 6-2 3-6 6-4 Fiorella Bonicelli Match data Aug 21, 1975* R64 Westchester WTA 250 Clay
Helen Gourlay 8-6 7-5 Fiorella Bonicelli Match data Jun 9, 1972* R16 Chichester WTA 250 Grass
Helen Gourlay 6-4 6-4 Fiorella Bonicelli Match data May 28, 1972* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Helen Gourlay — — — 1,962 295 201 59.5% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Fiorella Bonicelli — — — 1,868 137 98 58.3% 0 0 0 0 12 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Helen Gourlay Fiorella Bonicelli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,509 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1969 11–8 57.9% — 1,604 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1970 11–5 68.8% — 1,702 0 2
19 — — — — — — — 1971 12–10 54.5% — 1,701 0 6
20 — — — — — — — 1972 26–16 61.9% — 1,796 0 9
21 1968 48–21 69.6% — 1,678 0 3 1973 24–11 68.6% — 1,842 0 11
22 1969 41–29 58.6% — 1,730 0 5 1974 6–4 60.0% — 1,800 0 11
23 1970 42–22 65.6% — 1,845 0 7 1975 12–13 48.0% — 1,774 0 12
24 1971 46–25 64.8% — 1,907 0 7 1976 14–8 63.6% — 1,776 0 12
25 1972 34–25 57.6% — 1,799 0 7 1977 9–10 47.4% — 1,763 0 12
26 1973 7–13 35.0% — 1,745 0 7 1978 10–9 52.6% — 1,742 0 12
27 1974 30–19 61.2% — 1,942 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 1975 8–14 36.4% — 1,841 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 1976 7–7 50.0% — 1,815 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 1977 24–19 55.8% — 1,897 0 7 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,728 0 12
31 1978 4–3 57.1% — 1,882 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 1984 1–1 50.0% — 1,717 0 12
33 1980 4–4 50.0% — 1,796 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Helen Gourlay Fiorella Bonicelli
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — 8 4 12 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — 10 3 13 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — —
21 1968 — — — — 34 10 44 77.3% 13 10 23 56.5% — — — — 1973 — — — — 19 8 27 70.4% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
22 1969 4 3 7 57.1% 21 11 32 65.6% 13 10 23 56.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1974 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 1970 14 7 21 66.7% 14 9 23 60.9% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 1971 8 4 12 66.7% 14 7 21 66.7% 24 14 38 63.2% — — — — 1976 — — — — 14 7 21 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1972 4 2 6 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 14 10 24 58.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 1973 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 — — — — 6 5 11 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 1974 8 4 12 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1975 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1976 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1977 2 3 5 40.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 16 6 22 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1978 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 1980 — — — — — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 43 29 72 59.7% 112 63 175 64.0% 118 80 198 59.6% 19 27 46 41.3% — 3 4 7 42.9% 103 67 170 60.6% 23 26 49 46.9% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Helen Gourlay Fiorella Bonicelli
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1510 98.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.19
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1604 117.2 — — — — — +35 -68 61.0% +0.41 0–3 (0%) — — -0.11
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1702 116.4 — — — — — +53 -159 61.8% +0.44 3–1 (75%) — — +1.28
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1702 122.1 — — — — — +58 -185 54.9% +0.33 3–4 (43%) — — +2.08
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1796 137.0 — — — — — +57 -166 58.0% +0.53 10–6 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 105.5 -0.59
21 1968 1678 124.8 — — — — — +138 -25 66.7% +1.23 12–8 (60%) — — +0.47 1973 1842 136.2 — — — — — +53 -147 63.0% +0.73 8–3 (73%) 6–4 (60%) 103.3 +0.33
22 1969 1730 129.9 — — — — -101 +74 0 57.0% +0.54 10–10 (50%) — — -2.37 1974 1800 119.7 — — — — — +33 -78 66.7% +1.33 1–2 (33%) — — +0.49
23 1970 1845 137.5 — — — — -65 -20 +20 61.9% +0.90 12–7 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 105.2 -3.63 1975 1774 138.4 — — — — -137 +22 -84 51.7% +0.29 6–6 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.0 -2.39
24 1971 1908 139.3 — — — — -97 +13 +18 59.3% +0.48 16–4 (80%) 6–4 (60%) 110.6 -3.93 1976 1777 132.4 — — — — — +29 — 59.2% +0.84 4–1 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 103.9 -0.37
25 1972 1799 145.3 — — — — -6 +158 +32 57.0% +0.73 7–5 (58%) 1–5 (17%) 97.7 -4.23 1977 1763 128.8 — — — — — +1 -63 50.0% -0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.6 -0.83
26 1973 1745 133.2 — — — — +25 +125 +41 34.9% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -2.97 1978 1743 134.2 — — — — — +42 -82 55.8% +0.28 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.2 -1.32
27 1974 1943 155.6 — — — — +1 -37 -73 58.2% +0.69 10–6 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 103.5 -7.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1975 1841 138.9 — — — — +23 +75 -47 42.3% -0.52 2–6 (25%) 0–3 (0%) — -2.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1976 1815 132.4 — — — — — +77 +28 50.0% +0.16 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1977 1898 153.8 — — — — -104 -101 +103 57.3% +0.74 3–7 (30%) 0–2 — -2.97 1982 1728 102.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.22
31 1978 1883 117.6 — — — — — -72 +76 50.0% -0.37 2–0 1–0 — -0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1717 101.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.67 1–1 — — +0.28
33 1980 1797 99.2 — — — — — — +40 42.1% +0.47 3–2 (60%) 0–5 (0%) 94.9 +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1962 144.2 — — — — -37 +58 +16 57.4% +0.59 81–60 (57%) 13–25 (34%) 97.0 -6.03 — 1868 138.2 — — — — -137 +40 -127 57.4% +0.47 40–35 (53%) 18–14 (56%) 102.7 -0.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.