H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Helen Gourlay vs Raquel Giscafre H2H: 4-0
Helen Gourlay holds a 4–0 lead over Raquel Giscafre in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Helen Gourlay leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Helen Gourlay won the 1975 US Open second round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 1975* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Helen Gourlay | 7-5 6-4 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
| Oct 4, 1974* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Helen Gourlay | 6-1 6-1 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1974* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Helen Gourlay | 1-6 6-2 6-2 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1974* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Helen Gourlay | 9-8 6-2 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helen Gourlay | — | — | — | 1,962 | 294 | 200 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Raquel Giscafre | — | — | — | 1,797 | 86 | 120 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Helen Gourlay | Raquel Giscafre | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1968 | 48–21 | 69.6% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1969 | 40–28 | 58.8% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1970 | 42–22 | 65.6% | — | 1,842 | 0 | 9 | 1972 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–25 | 64.8% | — | 1,904 | 0 | 9 | 1973 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1972 | 34–25 | 57.6% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 9 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1973 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 9 | 1975 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1974 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,942 | 0 | 9 | 1976 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1975 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,838 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 9 | 1978 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1977 | 24–19 | 55.8% | — | 1,892 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 9 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1980 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |