H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Helena Sukova vs Julie Richardson H2H: 2-0

Helena Sukova holds a 2–0 lead over Julie Richardson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Helena Sukova leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Helena Sukova won the 1992 Eastbourne Open round of 64 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Helena Sukova
CZE Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Julie Richardson
NZL Age 59 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Helena Sukova #18 6-1 6-4 Julie Richardson #233 Match data Jun 17, 1992* R64 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Helena Sukova #6 7-5 6-0 Julie Richardson #107 Match data Jan 18, 1989* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Helena Sukova #102 #4 735 2,218 581 300 65.9% 0 0 0 3 6 9
Julie Richardson #643 #102 9 1,574 28 65 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Helena Sukova Julie Richardson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1981 6–4 60.0% — 1,584 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 23–23 50.0% — 1,756 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1983 33–20 62.3% — 1,907 0 0 1985 2–3 40.0% #145 1,505 0 0
19 1984 48–23 67.6% #7 2,041 0 1 1986 1–7 12.5% #162 1,456 0 0
20 1985 54–21 72.0% #9 2,028 0 1 1987 5–7 41.7% #157 1,480 0 0
21 1986 69–21 76.7% #5 2,151 0 3 1988 12–15 44.4% #103 1,557 0 0
22 1987 58–19 75.3% #7 2,129 0 5 1989 1–7 12.5% #257 1,507 0 0
23 1988 49–20 71.0% #8 2,098 0 5 1990 5–7 41.7% #137 1,528 0 0
24 1989 39–15 72.2% #8 2,036 0 6 1991 0–3 0.0% #556 1,504 0 0
25 1990 41–17 70.7% #14 2,024 0 6 1992 1–8 11.1% #157 1,459 0 0
26 1991 34–18 65.4% #17 1,958 0 7 1993 1–6 14.3% #301 1,411 0 0
27 1992 39–16 70.9% #12 1,965 0 9 1994 0–2 0.0% #367 1,400 0 0
28 1993 24–15 61.5% #17 1,922 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1994 21–14 60.0% #22 1,887 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1995 18–15 54.5% #29 1,819 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1996 17–16 51.5% #35 1,776 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1997 8–21 27.6% #80 1,655 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1998 0–2 0.0% #102 1,632 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Helena Sukova Julie Richardson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1981 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 8 4 12 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1985 — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
19 1984 12 5 17 70.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 18 9 27 66.7% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 18 5 23 78.3% 13 6 19 68.4% 1987 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1986 23 5 28 82.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% 27 10 37 73.0% 1988 10 11 21 47.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 1989 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 1988 21 9 30 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 1990 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1989 26 6 32 81.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 1991 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 1992 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 1991 16 6 22 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 1993 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1992 20 7 27 74.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 1993 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 2 11 13 15.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 213 105 318 67.0% 75 53 128 58.6% 125 49 174 71.8% 164 90 254 64.6% — 19 41 60 31.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 17 26 34.6% 0 5 5 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Helena Sukova Julie Richardson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1981 1584 127.8 — — — — — — +54 59.1% +0.91 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 1756 137.3 — — — — -64 -77 -97 48.2% -0.15 11–7 (61%) 4–7 (36%) 105.5 -2.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1907 149.3 — — — — -85 -97 -127 59.7% +0.67 8–5 (62%) 6–8 (43%) 102.3 -2.48 1985 1506 109.6 — — — — — — +98 45.5% +0.09 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.50
19 1984 2042 154.9 — — — — -99 -323 +10 60.7% +0.75 20–6 (77%) 9–10 (47%) 108.0 -2.37 1986 1457 96.3 — — — — +67 — — 11.8% -2.65 1–0 0–1 — +0.40
20 1985 2029 162.4 — — — — -21 -243 +104 68.7% +1.34 9–7 (56%) 9–7 (56%) 101.9 -3.44 1987 1481 103.7 — — — — +21 — +115 41.4% -0.66 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 101.9 +1.02
21 1986 2152 173.6 — — — — +12 -258 +29 73.5% +1.77 11–9 (55%) 7–9 (44%) 97.5 -7.60 1988 1558 120.8 — — — — -12 — +44 45.8% -0.20 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 98.0 +1.35
22 1987 2130 164.9 — — — — +25 -243 +121 69.5% +1.40 17–7 (71%) 11–4 (73%) 105.2 -4.98 1989 1507 105.8 — — — — -9 — +69 21.1% -2.21 1–2 (33%) — — +0.02
23 1988 2099 164.2 — — — — +36 -123 +89 67.1% +1.03 10–4 (71%) 14–3 (82%) 109.5 -5.27 1990 1528 104.3 — — — — -8 — +52 44.0% -0.60 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.93
24 1989 2037 158.2 — — — — +97 -141 +86 67.5% +1.04 9–3 (75%) 10–3 (77%) 106.3 -1.47 1991 1504 101.0 — — — — -22 — — 0.0% -3.33 — 0–1 — -0.21
25 1990 2025 160.0 — — — — +46 -104 +169 64.7% +0.88 13–4 (76%) 7–2 (78%) 106.6 -0.53 1992 1460 107.6 — — — — -39 — +124 19.0% -2.00 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 -0.25
26 1991 1958 153.8 — — — — +56 -26 +161 63.2% +1.02 9–6 (60%) 5–7 (42%) 95.3 +0.66 1993 1411 93.4 — — — — -32 — — 21.4% -2.29 1–1 1–0 — +0.47
27 1992 1966 153.3 — — — — +48 -64 +185 69.2% +1.42 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 96.8 +2.03 1994 1400 94.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.09
28 1993 1922 151.2 — — — — +11 — +198 60.2% +0.82 7–5 (58%) 4–6 (40%) 94.8 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 1887 144.4 — — — — +13 -45 +168 56.1% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 2–6 (25%) 97.3 +1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1820 144.1 — — — — +24 +33 +207 53.9% +0.05 7–5 (58%) 9–2 (82%) 105.6 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1776 135.6 — — — — +9 -3 +295 50.6% +0.28 7–6 (54%) 4–4 (50%) 97.0 +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 1655 126.9 — — — — -12 +65 +386 32.3% -1.05 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 92.0 -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1632 97.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.34 0–2 — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2218 162.3 — — — — +10 -125 +96 62.6% +0.89 156–93 (63%) 105–89 (54%) 103.0 -3.16 — 1575 110.1 — — — — -5 — +83 33.5% -1.18 11–13 (46%) 8–15 (35%) 97.9 +4.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.