H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Helena Sukova vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 3-0
Helena Sukova holds a 3–0 lead over Kathy Horvath in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Helena Sukova leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Helena Sukova won the 1986 Hilton Head third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 1986* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Helena Sukova | 6-1 6-3 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
| May 24, 1985* | Lugano | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Helena Sukova | 6-1 6-3 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
| Jan 25, 1983* | Marco Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Helena Sukova | 6-3 7-5 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helena Sukova | #102 | #4 | 735 | 2,217 | 580 | 297 | 66.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Helena Sukova | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #7 | 2,041 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 2,028 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1986 | 69–21 | 76.7% | #6 | 2,151 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1987 | 58–19 | 75.3% | #7 | 2,129 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1988 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,120 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1989 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 1990 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #14 | 2,025 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 1991 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 1,958 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |
| 1992 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,925 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #35 | 1,792 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,637 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |