H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Hiebler vs Rabus H2H: 1-0

Hiebler holds a 1–0 lead over Rabus in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hiebler leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hiebler won the 1976 Braunschweig round of 32 7-5 6-3.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hiebler 7-5 6-3 Rabus Match data Jul 8, 1976* R32 Braunschweig WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hiebler 1,500 3 5 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rabus 1,500 0 2 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Hiebler Rabus
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1974 0–1 0.0% 1,488 0 0 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,483 0 0
1975 1–2 33.3% 1,471 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,472 0 0
1976 2–2 50.0% 1,478 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Hiebler Rabus
Yr ClayCarpet Yr ClayCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1974 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 0 1 1 0.0%
1975 1 2 3 33.3% 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
1976 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% Career 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Hiebler Rabus
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1974 1488 99.5 0.0% -2.50 +0.12 1976 1483 97.2 0.0% -2.50 +0.23
1975 1471 97.3 +17 44.4% -0.11 1–2 (33%) +0.51 1980 1472 95.8 0.0% -4.50 -0.04
1976 1478 104.3 55.6% +0.89 0–1 +1.04
Career 1500 100.7 +17 45.0% +0.10 1–3 (25%) +20.88 Career 1500 96.5 0.0% -3.50 +9.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.