H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Hu Na vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 0-1

Patricia Medrado holds a 1–0 lead over Hu Na in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patricia Medrado leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Medrado won the 1981 Tokyo Borden round of 32 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hu Na
USA Age 63 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Patricia Medrado
BRA Age 69

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patricia Medrado 6-2 6-4 Hu Na Match data Oct 15, 1981* R32 Tokyo Borden WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hu Na — — — 1,702 60 94 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Patricia Medrado — #67 9 1,837 156 164 48.8% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hu Na Patricia Medrado
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1980 2–3 40.0% — 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,497 0 0 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,535 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1976 0–2 0.0% — 1,517 0 0
20 1983 1–3 25.0% — 1,482 0 0 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,527 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1978 10–12 45.5% — 1,626 0 1
22 1985 6–9 40.0% — 1,537 0 0 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,632 0 1
23 1986 11–16 40.7% — 1,575 0 0 1980 22–10 68.8% — 1,656 0 4
24 1987 17–18 48.6% — 1,654 0 0 1981 38–20 65.5% — 1,740 0 8
25 1988 8–18 30.8% — 1,584 0 0 1982 33–25 56.9% — 1,779 0 10
26 1989 8–13 38.1% — 1,578 0 0 1983 4–18 18.2% — 1,577 0 10
27 1990 7–12 36.8% — 1,560 0 0 1984 11–15 42.3% #108 1,588 0 10
28 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,542 0 0 1985 8–14 36.4% — 1,542 0 10
29 — — — — — — — 1986 12–14 46.2% #76 1,562 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1987 6–13 31.6% #117 1,550 0 10
31 — — — — — — — 1988 4–11 26.7% #180 1,473 0 10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hu Na Patricia Medrado
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1983 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1985 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1986 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1980 — — — — 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — —
24 1987 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1988 7 10 17 41.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 2 6 8 25.0% 27 9 36 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
26 1989 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 3 5 8 37.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1 5 6 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 29 46 75 38.7% 7 14 21 33.3% 16 22 38 42.1% 7 11 18 38.9% — 29 50 79 36.7% 84 75 159 52.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 3 21 24 12.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hu Na Patricia Medrado
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1980 1505 99.2 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.30 — 2–0 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 1497 95.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 1975 1535 102.4 — — — — — +33 — 75.0% +1.25 — — — +0.95
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1517 92.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.04
20 1983 1482 102.8 — — — — +56 — — 25.0% -1.13 — — — +0.33 1977 1528 97.0 — — — — +38 — — 33.3% -2.22 0–1 1–0 — +0.68
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1627 116.6 — — — — +12 -76 — 40.4% -0.75 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 109.3 +0.30
22 1985 1538 121.1 — — — — +34 — +34 43.8% -0.75 0–2 0–2 — +0.41 1979 1633 122.5 — — — — -19 -10 — 40.9% -1.45 1–3 (25%) 5–0 (100%) 101.8 -0.21
23 1986 1575 112.6 — — — — +6 -17 -4 42.2% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 104.9 +2.24 1980 1657 127.1 — — — — — -77 — 64.9% +1.30 6–4 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 97.7 +0.61
24 1987 1655 129.6 — — — — -12 -86 -57 49.4% +0.18 6–7 (46%) 2–6 (25%) 98.9 -0.09 1981 1740 134.1 — — — — -99 -51 — 63.3% +1.20 7–7 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 96.3 +2.33
25 1988 1584 122.3 — — — — +26 -52 -39 36.7% -0.90 2–6 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.3 -0.70 1982 1780 140.9 — — — — -182 +94 — 56.6% +0.45 6–11 (35%) 7–3 (70%) 98.9 -1.80
26 1989 1578 119.7 — — — — -33 -61 +49 39.6% -0.33 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 +0.25 1983 1578 104.1 — — — — -85 +204 — 24.0% -1.80 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 +0.41
27 1990 1561 108.7 — — — — -58 -60 +89 41.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 96.9 +0.79 1984 1589 120.4 — — — — -106 +162 — 48.3% -0.34 0–6 (0%) 5–3 (63%) 95.2 +0.35
28 1991 1542 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.17 1985 1543 114.5 — — — — -89 +100 — 39.1% -0.22 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.79
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1562 123.2 — — — — -78 +112 — 49.2% +0.11 5–8 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.4 +0.75
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1551 107.8 — — — — -104 +50 — 39.1% -0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.0 +0.60
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1473 104.6 — — — — -64 +64 — 31.4% -1.20 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +1.45
Career — 1702 122.8 — — — — -1 -57 +13 41.8% -0.47 17–27 (39%) 16–19 (46%) 96.9 +2.06 — 1838 128.5 — — — — -84 +56 — 49.6% +0.05 39–57 (41%) 38–30 (56%) 96.2 +2.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.