H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Iga Swiatek vs Anastasija Sevastova H2H: 0-1
Anastasija Sevastova holds a 1–0 lead over Iga Swiatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasija Sevastova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2019 US Open second round 3-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 25
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
LAT
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2019* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Anastasija Sevastova | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | Iga Swiatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | #8 | #1 | 11,695 | 2,284 | 322 | 84 | 79.3% | 6 | 12 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 25 |
| Anastasija Sevastova | #293 | #11 | 3,366 | 1,946 | 207 | 175 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iga Swiatek | Anastasija Sevastova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #60 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 13–5 | 72.2% | #17 | 1,863 | 1 | 1 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #9 | 1,946 | 1 | 3 | 2010 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2022 | 65–9 | 87.8% | #1 | 2,167 | 3 | 11 | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2023 | 67–11 | 85.9% | #1 | 2,214 | 4 | 17 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2024 | 50–8 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,216 | 5 | 22 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2025 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #2 | 2,143 | 6 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2026 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,046 | 6 | 25 | 2015 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #113 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #54 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #680 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #481 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #188 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 |