Iga Swiatek
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | 11 | 3 | 14 | May 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 7 | 6 | 13 | Aug 20, 2026 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 8 | 5 | 13 | Jun 5, 2025 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 7 | 5 | 12 | Aug 22, 2026 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 6 | 4 | 10 | Aug 17, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Iga Swiatek holds a 4–1 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Iga Swiatek leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2025 Wuhan Open quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | 6-1 6-2 | Iga Swiatek | Match data | Oct 10, 2025 | QF | Wuhan Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Iga Swiatek | 7-5 6-4 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data | Aug 18, 2025 | F | Cincinnati Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Iga Swiatek | 6-1 6-3 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data | Jun 27, 2025 | SF | Bad Homburg Open | WTA 500 | Grass |
| Iga Swiatek | 6-2 6-1 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data | Jun 9, 2024* | F | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Iga Swiatek | 6-3 6-0 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data | Aug 31, 2022* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | #8 | #1 | 11,695 | 2,287 | 341 | 88 | 79.5% | 6 | 12 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 26 |
| Jasmine Paolini | #21 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,056 | 176 | 138 | 56.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iga Swiatek | Jasmine Paolini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #60 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 13–5 | 72.2% | #17 | 1,863 | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 36–15 | 70.6% | #9 | 1,936 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2022 | 65–9 | 87.8% | #1 | 2,165 | 3 | 11 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 67–11 | 85.9% | #1 | 2,224 | 4 | 17 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 55–9 | 85.9% | #2 | 2,208 | 5 | 22 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #2 | 2,142 | 6 | 25 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2026 | 33–12 | 73.3% | #8 | 2,116 | 6 | 26 | 2021 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #53 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #4 | 1,973 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,003 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #21 | 1,891 | 0 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Iga Swiatek | Jasmine Paolini | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2019 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2022 | 45 | 7 | 52 | 86.5% | 18 | 1 | 19 | 94.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2023 | 41 | 7 | 48 | 85.4% | 19 | 2 | 21 | 90.5% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 2018 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2024 | 27 | 6 | 33 | 81.8% | 26 | 2 | 28 | 92.9% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2019 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2025 | 37 | 11 | 48 | 77.1% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 10 | 1 | 11 | 90.9% | 2020 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2026 | 22 | 6 | 28 | 78.6% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2021 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63.2% | 13 | 3 | 16 | 81.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| Career | — | 205 | 58 | 263 | 77.9% | 109 | 19 | 128 | 85.2% | 27 | 11 | 38 | 71.1% | — | 104 | 81 | 185 | 56.2% | 57 | 45 | 102 | 55.9% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 403/429 of Iga Swiatek's and 293/315 of Jasmine Paolini's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Iga Swiatek | Jasmine Paolini | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2019 | 25/25 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 54.2% | 64.5% | 50.8% | 54.2% | 49.8% | 58.2% | 45.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 18/18 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 57.8% | 63.8% | 53.6% | 54.6% | 46.5% | 59.4% | 48.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 47/51 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 57.0% | 70.7% | 53.6% | 51.5% | 43.7% | 63.4% | 46.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2022 | 74/74 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 65.4% | 68.3% | 53.3% | 55.3% | 53.4% | 62.9% | 51.5% | 2017 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 57.7% | 43.8% | 38.8% | 63.0% | 0.0% | 40.4% | 28.4% |
| 22 | 2023 | 74/78 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 65.3% | 71.0% | 56.2% | 49.1% | 59.0% | 66.0% | 53.0% | 2018 | 8/8 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 66.1% | 52.3% | 45.2% | 51.3% | 50.3% | 50.2% | 43.5% |
| 23 | 2024 | 57/64 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 65.8% | 71.0% | 57.1% | 59.0% | 48.8% | 66.2% | 49.4% | 2019 | 15/15 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 66.2% | 56.5% | 45.9% | 54.7% | 50.4% | 52.8% | 41.7% |
| 24 | 2025 | 63/74 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 61.4% | 70.5% | 49.0% | 57.0% | 53.8% | 62.4% | 49.5% | 2020 | 12/12 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 63.6% | 54.1% | 41.6% | 49.3% | 44.2% | 49.7% | 47.1% |
| 25 | 2026 | 45/45 | 1.7 | 3.1 | 66.2% | 69.0% | 51.2% | 58.4% | 54.4% | 62.8% | 50.3% | 2021 | 38/39 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 66.3% | 59.5% | 45.8% | 55.3% | 49.1% | 54.9% | 43.2% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 40/42 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 66.5% | 59.5% | 46.8% | 53.2% | 49.7% | 55.4% | 43.9% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 47/48 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 68.3% | 59.0% | 48.4% | 51.4% | 45.2% | 55.7% | 43.5% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 53/59 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 67.8% | 63.6% | 47.8% | 52.9% | 52.6% | 58.5% | 45.8% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 51/61 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 68.1% | 62.2% | 49.5% | 52.0% | 49.2% | 57.9% | 45.7% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 27/29 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 67.8% | 60.6% | 49.2% | 58.9% | 46.2% | 56.5% | 44.4% |
| Career | — | 403/429 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 62.9% | 69.4% | 53.3% | 54.8% | 52.3% | 63.5% | 49.9% | — | 293/315 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 67.2% | 60.1% | 47.4% | 53.4% | 48.5% | 55.9% | 44.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Iga Swiatek | Jasmine Paolini | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2019 | 1745 | 132.7 | +0.77 | +1.74 | 1.084 | 51.8% | -28 | -78 | — | 51.7% | +0.22 | 6–4 (60%) | 1–3 (25%) | 102.2 | +0.81 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 1864 | 147.1 | +2.15 | +3.63 | 1.204 | 54.0% | -102 | -28 | — | 71.1% | +1.58 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 1937 | 156.2 | +5.89 | +3.79 | 1.261 | 54.4% | -81 | +86 | -187 | 67.6% | +1.32 | 5–5 (50%) | 5–3 (63%) | 101.2 | +0.86 | 2016 | 1484 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2022 | 2166 | 172.9 | +6.26 | +8.30 | 1.388 | 57.0% | +1 | +38 | -403 | 79.6% | +2.40 | 16–5 (76%) | 6–5 (55%) | 104.9 | -0.64 | 2017 | 1454 | 95.0 | -0.81 | -0.44 | 0.476 | 36.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.25 | — | — | — | -0.39 |
| 22 | 2023 | 2225 | 175.7 | +8.79 | +10.09 | 1.558 | 59.3% | +33 | +59 | -314 | 83.0% | +2.76 | 9–6 (60%) | 10–4 (71%) | 102.0 | -1.15 | 2018 | 1499 | 110.7 | -1.60 | -1.28 | 0.874 | 47.0% | — | +21 | — | 37.5% | -0.88 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.11 |
| 23 | 2024 | 2208 | 173.7 | +8.58 | +7.08 | 1.463 | 57.5% | +22 | +181 | -245 | 80.5% | +2.34 | 8–3 (73%) | 6–2 (75%) | 101.3 | -0.33 | 2019 | 1587 | 114.9 | -2.75 | -0.55 | 0.884 | 47.2% | -71 | +39 | — | 37.1% | -1.12 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–1 | — | -0.63 |
| 24 | 2025 | 2143 | 173.0 | +5.66 | +6.77 | 1.318 | 55.9% | +24 | +166 | +108 | 75.3% | +1.91 | 8–7 (53%) | 7–6 (54%) | 95.7 | -0.36 | 2020 | 1550 | 117.8 | -2.87 | +2.21 | 0.937 | 48.4% | -99 | +114 | — | 33.3% | -0.85 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | -0.53 |
| 25 | 2026 | 2117 | 167.7 | +5.34 | +7.29 | 1.353 | 56.4% | +75 | +109 | +15 | 69.9% | +1.89 | 7–8 (47%) | 4–3 (57%) | 93.2 | +0.56 | 2021 | 1770 | 130.2 | -1.17 | -0.08 | 0.958 | 49.4% | -55 | -35 | — | 47.8% | -0.30 | 9–5 (64%) | 4–2 (67%) | 110.2 | -0.03 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1742 | 131.6 | -1.55 | +0.45 | 0.984 | 49.9% | -12 | +2 | — | 50.5% | +0.13 | 11–10 (52%) | 2–7 (22%) | 98.4 | -0.51 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1848 | 138.9 | -0.40 | +0.93 | 0.981 | 49.6% | -23 | -12 | -324 | 47.7% | -0.21 | 10–5 (67%) | 5–4 (56%) | 106.5 | -1.68 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1973 | 157.6 | +2.06 | +3.44 | 1.105 | 52.2% | -50 | -13 | -140 | 63.3% | +0.79 | 9–9 (50%) | 11–3 (79%) | 105.7 | +0.64 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2004 | 161.4 | +1.61 | +2.90 | 1.085 | 52.0% | -5 | +75 | -162 | 62.5% | +0.68 | 11–5 (69%) | 8–5 (62%) | 106.8 | +1.91 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1891 | 138.3 | -0.19 | +0.80 | 1.021 | 50.6% | +24 | +89 | +18 | 50.7% | +0.16 | 9–4 (69%) | 1–5 (17%) | 99.0 | +2.54 |
| Career | — | 2288 | 172.8 | +6.29 | +6.96 | 1.366 | 56.5% | +7 | +87 | -129 | 75.0% | +2.02 | 60–39 (61%) | 40–28 (59%) | 100.6 | -0.07 | — | 2056 | 144.8 | -0.10 | +1.43 | 1.005 | 50.3% | -26 | +27 | -129 | 52.4% | +0.10 | 65–40 (62%) | 33–28 (54%) | 112.0 | +0.46 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | 11 | 3 | 14 | May 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 7 | 6 | 13 | Aug 20, 2026 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 8 | 5 | 13 | Jun 5, 2025 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 7 | 5 | 12 | Aug 22, 2026 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 6 | 4 | 10 | Aug 17, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | 6 | 1 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 3 | 4 | 7 | Nov 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 1 | 6 | 7 | Nov 2, 2025 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 4 | 3 | 7 | Oct 18, 2025 | H2H |
| Caroline Garcia | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 11, 2025 | H2H |