H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Iga Swiatek vs Jasmine Paolini H2H: 4-1
Iga Swiatek holds a 4–1 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Iga Swiatek leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2025 Wuhan quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 25
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2025 | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 6-1 6-2 | Iga Swiatek | Match data |
| Aug 18, 2025 | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | F | Hard | Iga Swiatek | 7-5 6-4 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Jun 27, 2025 | Bad Homburg | WTA 500 | SF | Grass | Iga Swiatek | 6-1 6-3 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Jun 9, 2024* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | F | Clay | Iga Swiatek | 6-2 6-1 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2022* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Iga Swiatek | 6-3 6-0 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | #8 | #1 | 11,695 | 2,284 | 322 | 84 | 79.3% | 6 | 12 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 25 |
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iga Swiatek | Jasmine Paolini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #60 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 13–5 | 72.2% | #17 | 1,863 | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #9 | 1,946 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2022 | 65–9 | 87.8% | #1 | 2,167 | 3 | 11 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 67–11 | 85.9% | #1 | 2,214 | 4 | 17 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 50–8 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,216 | 5 | 22 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #2 | 2,143 | 6 | 25 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2026 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,046 | 6 | 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 |