H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Irina-Camelia Begu vs Carina Witthoeft H2H: 2-1
Irina-Camelia Begu holds a 2–1 lead over Carina Witthoeft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Irina-Camelia Begu leads 1–0 on clay, while Carina Witthoeft leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Carina Witthoeft won the 2016 Wimbledon first round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2016* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Carina Witthoeft | 6-1 6-4 | Irina-Camelia Begu | Match data |
| Jan 24, 2015* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Irina-Camelia Begu | 6-4 6-4 | Carina Witthoeft | Match data |
| Jul 18, 2013* | Bad Gastein | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Irina-Camelia Begu | 6-3 6-3 | Carina Witthoeft | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irina-Camelia Begu | #204 | #22 | 1,925 | 1,886 | 249 | 234 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Carina Witthoeft | #1,212 | #48 | 1,093 | 1,745 | 49 | 69 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Irina-Camelia Begu | Carina Witthoeft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #40 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #52 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #64 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #41 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #170 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #29 | 1,711 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #43 | 1,667 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #67 | 1,601 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #102 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,710 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #34 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #75 | 1,781 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,807 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #144 | 1,760 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,726 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |