H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:18 UTC

Irina-Camelia Begu vs Venus Williams H2H: 1-1

Irina-Camelia Begu and Venus Williams are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Irina-Camelia Begu leads 1–0 on grass, while Venus Williams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Irina-Camelia Begu won the 2026 Bad Homburg third round 6-2 4-6 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Irina-Camelia Begu
ROU Age 35 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 22, 2026 Bad Homburg WTA 500 R32 Grass Irina-Camelia Begu #211 6-2 4-6 7-6(6) Venus Williams #471 Match data
Aug 9, 2017* Toronto WTA 1000 R64 Hard Venus Williams #9 6-1 3-6 6-3 Irina-Camelia Begu #59 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Irina-Camelia Begu #204 #22 1,925 1,886 249 234 51.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Irina-Camelia Begu Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2009 0–1 0.0% #234 1,493 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2010 0–1 0.0% #202 1,485 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2011 16–11 59.3% #40 1,657 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2012 22–18 55.0% #52 1,729 0 1 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2013 10–17 37.0% #131 1,559 0 1 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2014 14–15 48.3% #41 1,617 0 1 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2015 30–20 60.0% #31 1,711 0 2 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2016 25–18 58.1% #29 1,711 0 3 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2017 20–22 47.6% #43 1,667 0 4 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2018 19–24 44.2% #67 1,601 0 4 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2019 11–16 40.7% #102 1,555 0 4 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2020 5–8 38.5% #78 1,710 0 4 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2021 17–15 53.1% #62 1,736 0 4 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2022 25–15 62.5% #34 1,834 0 5 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2023 17–14 54.8% #75 1,781 0 5 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2024 10–7 58.8% #79 1,807 0 5 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2025 7–9 43.8% #144 1,760 0 6 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2026 1–3 25.0% #204 1,726 0 6 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47