H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Irina Falconi Hartman vs Edina Gallovits Hall H2H: 1-0
Irina Falconi Hartman holds a 1–0 lead over Edina Gallovits Hall in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Irina Falconi Hartman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Irina Falconi Hartman won the 2012 Roland Garros first round 3-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 41
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Irina Falconi Hartman | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Edina Gallovits Hall | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irina Falconi Hartman | #1,008 | #63 | 1,005 | 1,614 | 42 | 72 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Edina Gallovits Hall | — | — | — | 1,642 | 50 | 80 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Irina Falconi Hartman | Edina Gallovits Hall | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #151 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #99 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #271 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |