H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Iroda Tulyaganova vs Iva Majoli H2H: 1-2
Iva Majoli holds a 2–1 lead over Iroda Tulyaganova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Iva Majoli leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Iva Majoli won the 2003 Sarasota fourth round 5-7 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UZB
Age 44
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2003* | Sarasota | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Iva Majoli | 5-7 6-0 7-5 | Iroda Tulyaganova | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2002* | Vienna | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Iroda Tulyaganova | 3-6 6-2 7-5 | Iva Majoli | Match data |
| Nov 14, 2000* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Iva Majoli | 7-5 6-4 | Iroda Tulyaganova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iroda Tulyaganova | #862 | #16 | 1,349 | 1,820 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iroda Tulyaganova | Iva Majoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 2000 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #75 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #20 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 |
| 20 | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #50 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #550 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 |
| 23 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #371 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 2006 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #131 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 |
| 26 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 |