H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Iroda Tulyaganova vs Meilen Tu H2H: 0-1
Meilen Tu holds a 1–0 lead over Iroda Tulyaganova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Meilen Tu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 2001 Toronto second round 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UZB
Age 44
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2001 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Meilen Tu | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Iroda Tulyaganova | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iroda Tulyaganova | #862 | #16 | 1,349 | 1,820 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Meilen Tu | #1,136 | #35 | 769 | 1,692 | 103 | 163 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iroda Tulyaganova | Meilen Tu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #161 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #75 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #20 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #81 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #50 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #103 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #550 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #67 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #371 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #45 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #131 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,478 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #630 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |