H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Isabel Cueto vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 1-0
Isabel Cueto holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Medrado in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Isabel Cueto leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Isabel Cueto won the 1987 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1987* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Isabel Cueto | 6-3 6-2 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isabel Cueto | #256 | #20 | 45 | 1,885 | 130 | 101 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Isabel Cueto | Patricia Medrado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #29 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #31 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #117 | 1,662 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 |