H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Iva Budarova vs Adriana Villagran Reami H2H: 1-1
Iva Budarova and Adriana Villagran Reami are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Adriana Villagran Reami won the 1988 Amelia Island third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 1988* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Adriana Villagran Reami | 6-2 6-3 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
| May 16, 1985* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Iva Budarova | 6-0 6-7 6-2 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Adriana Villagran Reami | — | — | — | 1,597 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Iva Budarova | Adriana Villagran Reami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 13–25 | 34.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |