H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Iva Budarova vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 0-1
Kathy Horvath holds a 1–0 lead over Iva Budarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kathy Horvath leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Horvath won the 1985 Indianapolis 1 fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TCH
Age 65
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 1985* | Indianapolis 1 | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Kathy Horvath | 6-2 6-3 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Iva Budarova | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |
| 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |