H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:33 UTC
Iva Jovic vs Renata Zarazua H2H: 2-0
Iva Jovic holds a 2–0 lead over Renata Zarazua in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Iva Jovic leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Iva Jovic won the 2026 Hobart fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 18
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 28
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2026 | Hobart | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Iva Jovic | 6-1 6-2 | Renata Zarazua | Match data |
| May 25, 2025 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Iva Jovic | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Renata Zarazua | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Jovic | #16 | #16 | 2,636 | 1,945 | 44 | 25 | 63.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Renata Zarazua | #83 | #51 | 1,063 | 1,746 | 30 | 59 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iva Jovic | Renata Zarazua | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2024 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2025 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #35 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2026 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #16 | 1,937 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #257 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #263 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #142 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #135 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #368 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #104 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #83 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |