H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Ivanna Madruga vs Julie Harrington H2H: 1-0

Ivanna Madruga holds a 1–0 lead over Julie Harrington in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivanna Madruga leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivanna Madruga won the 1980 Amelia Island round of 16 6-0 6-4.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ivanna Madruga 6-0 6-4 Julie Harrington Match data Apr 19, 1980* R16 Amelia Island WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ivanna Madruga 1,916 131 88 59.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Julie Harrington #175 #70 1,741 55 80 40.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivanna Madruga Julie Harrington
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1975 1–1 50.0% 1,504 0 0
16 1977 0–1 0.0% 1,489 0 0
17 1978 6–6 50.0% 1,555 0 0 1979 3–6 33.3% 1,523 0 0
18 1979 7–10 41.2% 1,628 0 0 1980 12–17 41.4% 1,602 0 0
19 1980 29–18 61.7% 1,799 0 0 1981 18–15 54.5% 1,724 0 0
20 1981 17–14 54.8% 1,752 0 0 1982 6–19 24.0% 1,589 0 0
21 1982 27–13 67.5% 1,822 0 1 1983 15–16 48.4% 1,629 0 0
22 1983 25–12 67.6% 1,881 0 1 1984 1–7 12.5% #175 1,571 0 0
23 1984 14–8 63.6% 1,830 0 1
25 1986 5–5 50.0% 1,775 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ivanna Madruga Julie Harrington
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1975 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1979 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1980 10 6 16 62.5% 19 8 27 70.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
20 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 7 8 12.5%
21 1982 2 3 5 40.0% 25 10 35 71.4% 1983 11 8 19 57.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1984 14 8 22 63.6%
25 1986 5 5 10 50.0%
Career 22 18 40 55.0% 99 53 152 65.1% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 28 31 59 47.5% 12 20 32 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 11 22 33 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ivanna Madruga Julie Harrington
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1975 1505 101.3 50.0% -0.50 +0.30
16 1977 1490 +0.22
17 1978 1556 122.4 +14 55.2% +0.10 1–4 (20%) 1–0 +0.29 1979 1524 114.6 +97 42.9% -0.76 0–3 (0%) 1–1 +0.68
18 1979 1628 139.2 +21 -20 -52 45.0% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 97.3 -0.36 1980 1602 125.8 -16 -20 -127 42.9% -0.17 2–5 (29%) 2–6 (25%) 94.7 -1.23
19 1980 1799 145.3 -111 +67 59.8% +1.16 9–3 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 106.3 -5.59 1981 1725 127.6 +24 -106 48.1% -0.03 10–3 (77%) 3–4 (43%) 108.5 +2.87
20 1981 1752 140.7 -101 +165 -157 55.6% +0.39 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 100.1 -2.27 1982 1589 116.4 -34 +6 31.1% -1.28 4–7 (36%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.86
21 1982 1822 151.7 -199 +149 64.4% +1.49 6–4 (60%) 1–1 -2.76 1983 1629 115.5 +33 -32 48.6% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.6 +2.39
22 1983 1882 143.6 -151 +78 65.9% +1.35 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 +0.61 1984 1571 105.9 +13 22.2% -1.83 0–2 3–1 (75%) -0.33
23 1984 1830 128.9 +30 63.3% +1.12 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) +0.18
25 1986 1776 112.3 +16 45.5% -0.23 2–0 1–2 (33%) +0.28
Career 1917 148.0 -116 +85 -109 59.2% +0.89 30–28 (52%) 12–18 (40%) 98.1 -4.16 1741 124.4 +18 -28 -127 42.0% -0.53 21–25 (46%) 14–16 (47%) 101.0 +2.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.