H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ivanna Madruga vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 3-2
Ivanna Madruga holds a 3–2 lead over Patricia Medrado in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Ivanna Madruga leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivanna Madruga won the 1983 US Open first round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1983* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Ivanna Madruga | 6-4 6-2 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
| Mar 28, 1982* | Rio de Janeiro | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Ivanna Madruga | 3-6 6-1 6-1 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
| May 8, 1981* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Ivanna Madruga | 7-6 7-6 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
| May 31, 1979* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Patricia Medrado | 7-6 6-1 | Ivanna Madruga | Match data |
| Oct 16, 1977* | Buenos Aires | WTA 250 | F | — | Patricia Medrado | 61 36 64 | Ivanna Madruga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivanna Madruga | — | — | — | 1,916 | 131 | 88 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivanna Madruga | Patricia Medrado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1978 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1979 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 29–18 | 61.7% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1982 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1983 | 25–12 | 67.6% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1984 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 |