H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Iveta Benesova vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 0-1
Tamira Paszek holds a 1–0 lead over Iveta Benesova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2006 Portoroz fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 43
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2006* | Portoroz | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Tamira Paszek | 6-1 6-2 | Iveta Benesova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iveta Benesova | #671 | #25 | 1,811 | 1,760 | 177 | 221 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Tamira Paszek | — | — | — | 1,801 | 99 | 128 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iveta Benesova | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2002 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2003 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #132 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2004 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #36 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2005 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2006 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #58 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2008 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #38 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #59 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #54 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2012 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #671 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |