H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Jana Cepelova vs Aleksandra Krunic H2H: 0-1
Aleksandra Krunic holds a 1–0 lead over Jana Cepelova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aleksandra Krunic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aleksandra Krunic won the 2017 Tashkent fourth round 6-2 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 33
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 33
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2017* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Aleksandra Krunic | 6-2 1-6 6-3 | Jana Cepelova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Cepelova | #894 | #50 | 1,074 | 1,685 | 55 | 91 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Aleksandra Krunic | #470 | #39 | 1,210 | 1,771 | 86 | 117 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Cepelova | Aleksandra Krunic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #165 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #56 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #108 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #144 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #108 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #54 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #188 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #158 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #163 | 1,561 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #286 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |