H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jana Cepelova vs Carina Witthoeft H2H: 2-0
Jana Cepelova holds a 2–0 lead over Carina Witthoeft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jana Cepelova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Cepelova won the 2018 Budapest third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 33
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2018* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jana Cepelova | 6-2 6-2 | Carina Witthoeft | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2016 | Dubai | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Jana Cepelova | 6-7(13) 6-2 6-4 | Carina Witthoeft | Match data |
| Jul 16, 2015* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Jana Cepelova | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Carina Witthoeft | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Cepelova | #894 | #50 | 1,074 | 1,685 | 55 | 91 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carina Witthoeft | #1,212 | #48 | 1,093 | 1,745 | 49 | 69 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jana Cepelova | Carina Witthoeft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #56 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #64 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #108 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #170 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #188 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #158 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |