Jana Cepelova
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annika Beck | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 23, 2017 | H2H |
| Elena Vesnina | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 24, 2016 | H2H |
| Katerina Siniakova | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 2, 2019 | H2H |
| Simona Halep | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 30, 2017 | H2H |
| Andrea Petkovic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 23, 2017 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Jana Cepelova vs Casey Dellacqua H2H: 0-1
Casey Dellacqua holds a 1–0 lead over Jana Cepelova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Casey Dellacqua leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Casey Dellacqua won the 2014 Miami Open round of 64 6-4 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casey Dellacqua | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | Jana Cepelova | Match data | Mar 19, 2014* | R64 | Miami Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Cepelova | #894 | #50 | 1,074 | 1,671 | 55 | 92 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Casey Dellacqua | #932 | #26 | 1,725 | 1,757 | 80 | 106 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Cepelova | Casey Dellacqua | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #56 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #157 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #108 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1002 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #188 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #227 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #158 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #134 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #142 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #29 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jana Cepelova | Casey Dellacqua | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2011 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2004 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2005 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2006 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2007 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 2016 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2008 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 2017 | 4 | 14 | 18 | 22.2% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2009 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2019 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 19 | 12 | 31 | 61.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| Career | — | 29 | 59 | 88 | 33.0% | 19 | 23 | 42 | 45.2% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | — | 53 | 74 | 127 | 41.7% | 10 | 16 | 26 | 38.5% | 17 | 16 | 33 | 51.5% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 141/147 of Jana Cepelova's and 163/185 of Casey Dellacqua's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jana Cepelova | Casey Dellacqua | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2011 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 86.4% | 50.9% | 11.1% | 53.8% | 25.0% | 45.5% | 40.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 9/10 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 66.5% | 58.4% | 44.1% | 49.8% | 44.8% | 53.6% | 45.4% | 2004 | 1/2 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 53.4% | 56.4% | 41.2% | 66.7% | 37.5% | 49.3% | 43.8% |
| 20 | 2013 | 21/21 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 64.1% | 54.6% | 39.5% | 44.2% | 52.4% | 49.4% | 42.5% | 2005 | 1/3 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 54.3% | 63.2% | 50.0% | 33.3% | 42.9% | 57.1% | 36.8% |
| 21 | 2014 | 36/37 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 67.6% | 56.9% | 44.2% | 52.4% | 51.9% | 53.1% | 45.6% | 2006 | 1/7 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 47.4% | 55.6% | 40.0% | 60.0% | 0.0% | 47.4% | 26.5% |
| 22 | 2015 | 12/15 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 69.0% | 51.6% | 43.2% | 43.7% | 42.8% | 48.3% | 40.4% | 2007 | 17/18 | 1.8 | 3.6 | 60.5% | 60.6% | 44.5% | 42.3% | 53.2% | 54.1% | 44.7% |
| 23 | 2016 | 21/21 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 64.5% | 59.8% | 43.9% | 45.0% | 50.4% | 54.1% | 43.3% | 2008 | 31/35 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 58.6% | 63.1% | 44.2% | 54.4% | 49.5% | 55.4% | 45.2% |
| 24 | 2017 | 28/29 | 1.0 | 2.9 | 62.6% | 60.1% | 38.9% | 43.3% | 43.7% | 52.2% | 42.9% | 2009 | 3/3 | 1.0 | 5.3 | 52.8% | 46.5% | 36.2% | 28.4% | 13.9% | 42.2% | 38.4% |
| 25 | 2018 | 7/7 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 64.5% | 58.3% | 43.6% | 51.6% | 51.1% | 53.2% | 42.9% | 2010 | 7/7 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 53.5% | 55.2% | 40.5% | 37.9% | 37.3% | 48.1% | 42.3% |
| 26 | 2019 | 6/6 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 62.5% | 54.9% | 37.2% | 24.8% | 54.2% | 46.8% | 44.3% | 2011 | 6/8 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 64.2% | 60.4% | 45.9% | 63.2% | 81.9% | 55.0% | 44.2% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 22/24 | 1.0 | 3.8 | 62.7% | 59.3% | 39.5% | 49.5% | 47.4% | 51.8% | 43.4% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 9/9 | 0.9 | 3.0 | 61.8% | 57.4% | 45.2% | 49.0% | 53.9% | 52.6% | 33.7% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 41/44 | 1.7 | 3.0 | 59.5% | 62.2% | 49.4% | 54.3% | 48.9% | 56.9% | 43.5% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 24/25 | 2.0 | 3.3 | 62.4% | 61.9% | 50.1% | 52.0% | 50.0% | 57.4% | 39.6% |
| Career | — | 141/147 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 65.4% | 57.2% | 41.7% | 46.2% | 48.8% | 51.8% | 43.6% | — | 163/186 | 1.8 | 3.6 | 60.1% | 60.8% | 45.6% | 50.9% | 49.4% | 54.6% | 42.6% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jana Cepelova | Casey Dellacqua | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2011 | 1486 | 97.3 | +0.56 | -1.05 | 0.740 | 43.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.07 | 2003 | 1489 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.33 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.02 |
| 19 | 2012 | 1535 | 104.0 | +0.24 | +0.88 | 0.978 | 49.6% | -13 | — | +117 | 43.5% | -0.39 | 3–0 (100%) | 1–2 (33%) | 103.5 | +0.42 | 2004 | 1473 | 96.4 | -3.43 | -1.30 | 0.865 | 46.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.14 |
| 20 | 2013 | 1511 | 109.4 | -5.00 | -1.81 | 0.840 | 45.9% | -15 | +25 | +91 | 35.4% | -1.19 | 3–3 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 102.3 | +0.41 | 2005 | 1475 | 101.7 | -1.70 | -1.14 | 0.860 | 46.6% | +3 | — | — | 42.9% | -1.14 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.05 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1599 | 124.4 | -2.47 | +1.17 | 0.972 | 49.3% | -50 | +49 | — | 48.8% | -0.24 | 6–6 (50%) | 6–2 (75%) | 105.4 | +0.63 | 2006 | 1501 | 113.4 | -0.08 | -1.23 | 0.504 | 37.7% | -2 | — | — | 37.5% | -1.00 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.22 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1575 | 106.4 | -3.91 | -1.07 | 0.783 | 44.6% | -70 | +65 | — | 35.3% | -1.18 | 4–2 (67%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.6 | -1.09 | 2007 | 1502 | 122.1 | -1.56 | -0.63 | 0.973 | 49.3% | +17 | — | +91 | 43.2% | -0.18 | 1–7 (13%) | — | — | -0.01 |
| 23 | 2016 | 1632 | 123.6 | -1.51 | +0.12 | 0.945 | 48.8% | -32 | -37 | -17 | 44.9% | -0.35 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–1 (67%) | 101.0 | -1.31 | 2008 | 1630 | 126.8 | -0.29 | +1.02 | 1.014 | 50.2% | +9 | -98 | -24 | 47.5% | -0.18 | 8–6 (57%) | 2–5 (29%) | 103.0 | +0.09 |
| 24 | 2017 | 1627 | 118.6 | -2.44 | -0.29 | 0.898 | 47.4% | -28 | -13 | -11 | 32.8% | -1.11 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–4 (50%) | 96.2 | -1.67 | 2009 | 1598 | 101.9 | -2.95 | -1.13 | 0.664 | 40.6% | +4 | — | — | 0.0% | -3.67 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.17 |
| 25 | 2018 | 1626 | 119.0 | -1.48 | -0.41 | 0.915 | 48.0% | +7 | — | — | 38.9% | -0.72 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–1 | — | -0.49 | 2010 | 1563 | 103.6 | -3.53 | -0.93 | 0.814 | 45.4% | +23 | — | — | 31.3% | -1.50 | 1–1 | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.55 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1619 | 111.1 | -2.22 | +0.48 | 0.832 | 45.4% | +46 | -54 | — | 27.3% | -1.36 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.45 | 2011 | 1541 | 104.0 | -1.59 | -2.06 | 0.982 | 49.7% | — | -17 | — | 42.1% | -0.26 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +0.43 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1567 | 95.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1593 | 122.1 | -1.70 | -0.55 | 0.901 | 47.8% | -3 | — | +45 | 42.3% | -0.52 | 4–2 (67%) | 0–2 | — | -0.51 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1490 | 95.2 | -2.07 | -4.32 | 0.712 | 44.0% | +4 | — | — | 15.8% | -2.16 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +1.12 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1742 | 139.6 | +0.67 | +0.45 | 1.011 | 50.3% | -28 | -176 | -39 | 55.2% | +0.23 | 13–6 (68%) | 4–5 (44%) | 108.7 | +0.21 |
| 30 | 2023 | 1546 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1629 | 117.9 | -0.10 | -0.71 | 0.929 | 48.4% | -22 | -90 | +90 | 43.1% | -0.65 | 1–7 (13%) | 3–3 (50%) | 93.4 | -0.22 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1613 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1671 | 120.4 | -2.57 | -0.05 | 0.905 | 47.7% | -30 | +17 | +41 | 40.0% | -0.75 | 23–26 (47%) | 19–14 (58%) | 104.7 | -2.37 | — | 1758 | 127.4 | -0.70 | -0.33 | 0.939 | 48.7% | -5 | -99 | +29 | 43.8% | -0.46 | 31–34 (48%) | 14–22 (39%) | 100.0 | +0.60 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Casey Dellacqua
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jun 18, 2015 | H2H |
| Na Li | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 15, 2014 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 3, 2014 | H2H |
| Marion Bartoli | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 27, 2012 | H2H |
| Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 1, 2012 | H2H |