H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jana Nejedly vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 0-2
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 2–0 lead over Jana Nejedly in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1996 Oklahoma fourth round 6-1 5-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 1996* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 6-1 5-7 6-1 | Jana Nejedly | Match data |
| Nov 2, 1995* | Canadian Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 1-6 6-2 6-4 | Jana Nejedly | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Nejedly | #914 | #64 | 488 | 1,626 | 49 | 104 | 32.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | #919 | #9 | 1,672 | 2,025 | 295 | 220 | 57.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Nejedly | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #149 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #83 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #328 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #43 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #30 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1995 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #82 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #130 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #40 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #75 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1999 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #88 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #69 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #96 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #188 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2002 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #233 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #893 | 1,651 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #299 | 1,642 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,614 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,592 | 0 | 7 |