H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jana Nejedly vs Elena Pampoulova H2H: 1-1
Jana Nejedly and Elena Pampoulova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Pampoulova won the 1999 Oklahoma third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BUL
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 1999* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Elena Pampoulova | 6-4 6-2 | Jana Nejedly | Match data |
| Jan 5, 1995* | Jakarta | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jana Nejedly | 6-3 6-4 | Elena Pampoulova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Nejedly | #914 | #64 | 488 | 1,626 | 49 | 104 | 32.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Elena Pampoulova | — | — | — | 1,658 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Nejedly | Elena Pampoulova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #328 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #82 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #130 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–10 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #75 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #88 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #69 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #96 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #233 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |